Skip to main content

Security report for synot.cz

SYNOT Group · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SYNOT Group is a well-established international gaming technology company founded in 1991, operating in over 45 countries. They provide a comprehensive portfolio of gaming solutions for both land-based casinos and online gaming platforms, including games, cabinets, jackpots, and casino management systems. The company maintains a strong market position with multiple certifications and licenses, reflecting their commitment to quality and compliance. Technically, the website is modern, fast, and mobile-optimized, leveraging contemporary JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and privacy compliance, though some security headers and incident response details could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not significantly detract from the overall legitimacy given the extensive business information and trust indicators present. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching synot.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SYNOT Group's market positioning as a global leader in gaming innovation is supported by its extensive international presence and diversified product offerings. Their business model focuses on supplying cutting-edge gaming technology and software solutions to casinos and online operators. Revenue streams likely include hardware sales, software licensing, and platform services. The target customer segments are casino operators, online gaming platforms, and gaming venues worldwide. The partnership ecosystem includes major industry players, enhancing their competitive advantage. Growth indicators include continuous product innovation, international expansion, and active participation in industry events. The company demonstrates strong operational maturity and brand consistency.

Security posture

The security maturity level of SYNOT Group's website is good, with HTTPS enforced and privacy policies in place. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and absence of a public vulnerability disclosure page or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The company should consider formalizing incident response procedures publicly and enhancing security headers to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity and trust but could be strengthened to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools for security.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SYNOT W, a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SYNOT Group
Description
SYNOT Group is an international group operating in over 45 countries, specializing in gaming technology and solutions for land-based and online gaming industries.
Key services
Land-based gaming equipment and games, Online gaming platforms and slots, Casino Management Systems, Jackpots and linked gaming solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Alpine.js, Splide.js, CookieConsent.js, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks with secure defaults

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent design.
  3. Comprehensive contact information with multiple international offices.
  4. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for a well-established company domain.
  8. Multiple international licenses and certifications displayed.
  9. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook.
  10. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern technology stack including Alpine.js for reactive UI components, Splide.js for carousels, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with fast loading times and good SEO practices. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. The technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience and robust content delivery. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement additional monitoring tools to further reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with synot.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review synot.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.