Skip to main content

Security report for symbio.agency

SYMBIO · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SYMBIO is a specialized brand and product marketing agency targeting technology companies including SaaS, tech-forward e-commerce, and media & entertainment sectors. The company positions itself as a revenue growth partner for disruptive tech companies, leveraging modern digital marketing strategies. The website is built using Framer, indicating a modern and visually appealing technical infrastructure, supported by Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of explicit contact information, suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Security posture is moderate with no detected blocking or WAF, but missing security headers and unclear SSL configuration indicate potential vulnerabilities. Overall, the site is professional and safe for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching symbio.agency

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the technology marketing sector with a focus on SaaS and e-commerce clients, indicating a niche market positioning. The business model revolves around providing brand and product marketing services to tech companies aiming to drive revenue growth. The lack of detailed company information such as founding year or parent company limits deeper business intelligence. The use of modern web technologies and marketing tools suggests a digitally mature operation. Absence of contact details and policies may impact client trust and regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. The website uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URL), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but the lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is poor due to missing policies. Overall, the security culture appears minimal and would benefit from formalized policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop an incident response plan and disclose security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SYMBIO
Description
Helping SaaS, tech‑forward E‑commerce, disruptive Media & Entertainment companies and other tech companies drive revenue.
Key services
Brand marketing, Product marketing, Revenue growth for tech companies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a marketing agency specialized in tech sector.
  2. No public WHOIS registrant data available due to privacy protection.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  5. Uses modern web technologies including Framer and Google Tag Manager.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is accessible.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking, and Google Fonts for typography. The technical implementation is modern with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, likely due to external resource loading. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with additional ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. No CMS other than Framer was detected. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site lacks advanced security configurations such as security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional marketing presence but requires enhancements in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with symbio.agency. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review symbio.agency.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.