Skip to main content

Security report for swmh-datenschutz.de

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website swmh-datenschutz.de is currently inaccessible due to an Access Denied error, likely caused by a web application firewall or other security mechanism. This prevents any meaningful extraction of business, technical, or security content from the site. The WHOIS data indicates the domain is active with multiple name servers under boreus.de, but lacks registrant details, limiting trust assessment. Due to the lack of accessible content, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, and no contact or security incident response information is available. The site’s technical infrastructure and digital maturity cannot be evaluated beyond the indication of security blocking. Overall, the security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the presence of blocking mechanisms suggests some level of protection. The risk assessment is high due to lack of transparency and content availability, and strategic recommendations focus on enabling secure, compliant, and accessible website content.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of swmh-datenschutz.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching swmh-datenschutz.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence can be derived from the inaccessible website content. The domain appears registered and active, but no company name, description, services, or market positioning information is available. No external or partner domains are linked, and no contact or trust indicators are present. The business model, target audience, and industry classification remain unknown.

Security posture

The security posture is indeterminate due to lack of accessible content and security header data. The Access Denied page suggests a security mechanism is in place, but no details on HTTPS, security headers, or vulnerability disclosures are available. No incident response or data protection officer contacts are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the site’s security maturity appears low from an external perspective, with critical improvements needed in transparency and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable secure HTTPS access and verify SSL/TLS configuration.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to meet GDPR requirements.
  3. Provide visible contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Ensure website content is accessible to users and search engines without unnecessary blocking.
  5. Implement security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website content is blocked with an Access Denied error indicating possible WAF or security restrictions. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Access Denied error.
  2. No metadata, scripts, forms, or business content available for analysis.
  3. WHOIS data shows active domain with multiple name servers but no registrant details.
  4. No contact information or policies found on the site.
  5. No external links or social media references detected.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available.
  7. Site likely protected by a security mechanism blocking content access.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently returns an Access Denied error with minimal HTML content, indicating a security block or misconfiguration. No metadata, scripts, or CMS indicators are present. The domain uses boreus.de name servers, but hosting provider and platform details are unknown. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be assessed. The technical implementation is poor due to lack of accessible content and absence of modern web technologies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with swmh-datenschutz.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review swmh-datenschutz.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.