Skip to main content

Security report for sweetroot.lt

Sweetroot · Other · Lithuania

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sweetroot.lt is a Lithuanian website primarily focused on microgreens products beneficial for health, supplemented by a blog covering diverse lifestyle topics such as internet tools, faith, entertainment, gardening, industry, canoe rental, and fashion. The site targets Lithuanian-speaking consumers interested in health and lifestyle content. The business model appears to be informational and content-driven, possibly supporting product promotion related to microgreens. The domain is relatively new, registered in 2022, consistent with the website's content and scope. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Zakra theme, with common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and a sliding captcha for spam prevention. It uses Cloudflare DNS services and serves content over HTTPS, ensuring basic security. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks visible security headers like CSP or HSTS, which could improve its security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or WAF blocking mechanisms were detected. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Contact information is limited to a contact form, with no direct emails or phone numbers provided. Overall, Sweetroot.lt is a small, content-focused website with a good user experience and moderate technical implementation. To enhance trust and security, it should implement privacy and cookie policies, add security headers, and provide clearer business contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sweetroot.lt

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sweetroot.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sweetroot.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sweetroot operates as a niche content provider focusing on health-related microgreens and lifestyle topics, targeting Lithuanian consumers. Its competitive advantage lies in localized, relevant content and a clean, user-friendly WordPress platform. The business model is likely based on content marketing, possibly supporting product sales or affiliate marketing. The website's recent domain registration aligns with a startup or small business phase. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential depends on expanding content, improving privacy compliance, and enhancing security to build user trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and Cloudflare DNS usage. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The use of Google reCAPTCHA and sliding captcha for contact forms indicates some protection against spam and bots. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sweetroot
Description
Sweetroot is a website focused on microgreens products beneficial for health. It also hosts blog content covering various topics such as internet tools, faith, entertainment, gardening, industry, canoe rental, and fashion.
Key services
Health-related microgreens product information, Blog articles on diverse lifestyle topics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Contact Form 7, Sliding Captcha for Contact Form 7, Font Awesome, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Zakra WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based blog focused on microgreens and lifestyle topics
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  3. Contact available only via a contact form; no emails or phone numbers found
  4. Uses Cloudflare DNS but no visible advanced security headers
  5. No visible business certifications or security policies
  6. Content is in Lithuanian and appears relevant and well-structured
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Zakra theme, with jQuery and Contact Form 7 plugins. It uses Cloudflare DNS services and serves content over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam prevention. There is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance. The technical infrastructure is suitable for a small content-driven website but should be enhanced for better security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sweetroot.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sweetroot.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.