Skip to main content

Security report for sweetblacks.com

Danesco Trading Ltd. · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SweetBlacks.com is an adult content search engine specializing in free Black, Ebony, and Interracial pornographic videos. The site aggregates millions of videos across numerous explicit categories and provides affiliate links to partner adult video platforms. The business operates under Danesco Trading Ltd., with domain registration consistent with the business model and no privacy protection, which is typical for this industry. The website is designed with basic but functional HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, indicating moderate technical maturity. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and no GDPR compliance indicators are present, which poses compliance risks. The site provides an abuse contact email but lacks other contact details such as phone numbers or physical addresses. Overall, the site is fully accessible with no WAF blocking and targets an adults-only audience with explicit content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sweetblacks.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a niche market within the adult entertainment industry, focusing on Black/Ebony/Interracial content. Its business model is based on free content aggregation and affiliate marketing, linking users to partner adult sites. The company is relatively new, founded in 2022, and operates as a small entity without visible subsidiaries or parent companies. The site’s market position is that of a specialized search engine within adult content, leveraging a broad category base to attract diverse adult viewers. The partnership ecosystem is extensive, linking to many external adult video platforms, which likely drives revenue through affiliate commissions. The lack of privacy and cookie policies and minimal contact information may impact trust and compliance with evolving regulations.

Security posture

The security posture of SweetBlacks.com is moderate. The domain uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URL) and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC, which could improve DNS security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which are recommended best practices. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content, and forms use POST methods, but no advanced input security measures are visible. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and GDPR compliance indicators suggests gaps in regulatory adherence. The presence of an abuse contact email is a positive incident response indicator. Overall, the site should enhance its security headers, enable DNSSEC, and implement privacy compliance measures to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to protect users.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add more detailed contact information, including phone numbers and physical addresses, to enhance business credibility.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danesco Trading Ltd.
Description
This website features millions of free Black / Ebony / Interracial porn videos across many categories. It operates as a search engine linking to adult video content hosted elsewhere.
Key services
Adult video search, Content aggregation, Affiliate linking to partner adult sites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult video search engine focused on Black/Ebony/Interracial content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact email for abuse is provided in footer.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. Site content is fully accessible with no WAF blocking.
  9. Site heavily relies on affiliate links to external adult video sites.
  10. Content is clearly adult and NSFW with explicit keywords and categories.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It uses Cloudflare for DNS hosting but does not enable DNSSEC, which is a missed opportunity for enhanced security. The site preloads CSS and JS assets and uses SVG icons for UI elements, indicating some attention to performance and modern web practices. The search form uses POST method but lacks visible CAPTCHA or anti-bot measures. The site is mobile optimized with a responsive viewport meta tag and good navigation clarity. SEO is supported by meta description and canonical tags. However, the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Performance is moderate, with external image assets loaded from affiliate domains. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and improved security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sweetblacks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sweetblacks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.