Skip to main content

Security report for sweet-family.sk

Považský cukor a.s. · Manufacturing · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SweetFamily, operated by Považský cukor a.s., is a well-established Slovak sugar manufacturing company with a history dating back to 1900. The company offers a variety of sugar products and supports its consumer base with recipes and blog content, targeting families and general consumers. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with clear contact information and active social media channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not present. Overall, the domain registration and business information are consistent and trustworthy, supporting the company's legitimacy and market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sweet-family.sk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sweet-family.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sweet-family.sk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid market position as a regional sugar producer with over a century of operation. Its business model focuses on manufacturing and retailing sugar products, supplemented by consumer engagement through recipes and blogs. The presence of Nordzucker in the contact email domain suggests a parent company relationship, indicating integration into a larger corporate group. The website's content quality and branding consistency support a credible and consumer-friendly image. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools effectively, indicating a mature digital presence. No suspicious or privacy-protected WHOIS data enhances trust. The company appears focused on growth and consumer engagement within the food manufacturing and retail sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management compliant with GDPR, and use of security-related plugins. However, there is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Security headers are partially detected or implied but not explicitly confirmed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of modern analytics and marketing scripts is balanced with privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized policies and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user data protection.
  2. Add incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and verify security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options for enhanced protection.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Považský cukor a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Považský cukor a.s.
Description
Už od roku 1900 ponúka cukrovar v Trenčianskej Teplej najlepšiu kvalitu svojich výrobkov, ktorú prinášame do vašich domácností v rozmanitej podobe.
Key services
Sugar production, Retail product sales, Recipe and blog content for consumers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, GeneratePress theme, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Fathom Analytics, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent, Splide.js slider
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Complianz)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Fathom Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Fathom Analytics
Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent management
  3. Clear contact information and social media presence
  4. Professional design and consistent branding
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. No terms of service page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using the GeneratePress theme, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Splide.js for sliders, and multiple analytics platforms such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Fathom Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading images and preconnect hints to improve loading times. SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD), Open Graph tags, and meta descriptions. Cookie consent is managed by the Complianz GDPR plugin, ensuring compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sweet-family.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sweet-family.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.