Skip to main content

Security report for svt-magazin.cz

Svaz podnikatelů ve stínicí technice - SPST · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.svt-magazin.cz serves as a specialized industry magazine focused on shading and gate technology, operated by the Svaz podnikatelů ve stínicí technice (SPST), a professional association established in 2009. It provides news, articles, event calendars, and advertising opportunities targeted at both professionals and laypersons interested in this niche sector. The site maintains a professional and consistent brand presence with clear business information and GDPR compliance. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins for advertising, GDPR cookie management, and user interface enhancements. It uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and includes structured data for SEO benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site integrates Google Analytics for user tracking and SmartEmailing for newsletter management. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response or security policy disclosures. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection slightly reduces trust but is consistent with a small professional publication. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with good privacy compliance and professional content. Strategic improvements in security headers and transparency around security policies would enhance its posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching svt-magazin.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The SPST operates a niche industry magazine serving the shading and gate technology sector in the Czech Republic. Its business model revolves around content publication, event promotion, and advertising sales. The association's membership and European affiliation provide credibility and market positioning. The website targets industry professionals and interested laypersons, offering specialized content and networking opportunities. Revenue likely derives from advertising and association membership services. The partnership ecosystem includes design and hosting providers, as well as email marketing services. Growth indicators include regular content updates and event calendars. The business maintains a focused and professional online presence aligned with its sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS and GDPR cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, indicating potential gaps in security transparency. The use of third-party scripts and plugins necessitates ongoing vulnerability management. Data protection practices appear compliant with GDPR, supported by a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small industry publication but could benefit from enhanced security controls and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish an explicit security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party plugins and scripts to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider publishing terms of service to clarify user rights and responsibilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Svaz podnikatelů ve stínicí technice - SPST
Registration number
IČ: 07160763
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Svaz podnikatelů ve stínicí technice - SPST
Description
Magazín stínicí a vratové techniky přináší zajímavé informace o všech typech stínicí techniky. Obsah je koncipován tak, aby byl podnětný pro odborníky i laiky.
Key services
Industry news and articles, Event calendar, Newsletter subscription, Advertising space
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Advanced Ads plugin, Easy Fancybox, Complianz GDPR plugin, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Advanced Ads
Marketing tools
SmartEmailing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  3. The site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for ads, GDPR compliance, and UI enhancements.
  4. Clear GDPR cookie consent banner and privacy policy present.
  5. Contact information includes company address and professional email.
  6. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages detected.
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. Content is industry-specific, professional, and safe for general audiences.
  10. Good SEO and structured data usage improve search visibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform utilizing jQuery and several plugins such as Advanced Ads, Easy Fancybox, and Complianz GDPR for cookie management. It employs Google Analytics for traffic analysis and SmartEmailing for newsletter subscriptions. The site is served over HTTPS with good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. Performance is moderate with optimized images and responsive design for mobile devices. Structured data in JSON-LD format is used effectively for SEO. There is no explicit hosting provider information detected. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the site's purpose, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with svt-magazin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review svt-magazin.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.