Skip to main content

Security report for suzanastojkovic.com

Suzana Stojković · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Suzana Stojković operates a professional creative services website specializing in branding, graphic design, web design, photography, and video/animation services. The website presents a strong market position with a portfolio of satisfied clients and testimonials, targeting businesses and individuals seeking tailored creative solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and several modern plugins, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though additional security headers and incident response mechanisms are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a credible digital presence for the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching suzanastojkovic.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small creative services provider with a focus on digital art and branding solutions. It leverages client testimonials and a diverse portfolio to establish credibility. The business model is service-based, targeting niche markets requiring customized creative outputs. The website integrates marketing tools such as Google Analytics and live chat to enhance customer engagement. While the company maintains a LinkedIn presence, other social media platforms are mentioned without direct links, indicating potential growth areas. The lack of physical address details beyond 'Belgrade' and missing phone contact may limit some customer trust factors. The domain's unclear registration status is a notable risk factor in business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks several recommended security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact reduces preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy policies and cookie notices. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business scale but could be improved with enhanced headers and formalized incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish an incident response page or provide a dedicated security contact email to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure domain legitimacy and build trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Expand social media presence with direct links and active engagement to increase brand visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Suzana Stojković
Description
Digital artist and creative professional offering branding, graphic design, web design, photography, video and animation services. Focused on delivering creative solutions tailored to client visions with expertise in digital art and marketing strategies.
Key services
Branding, Graphic Design, Web Design, Photography, Video and Animation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, JavaScript, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Contact Form 7, jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Swiper, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, Chatway Live Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional creative services website with strong branding and client testimonials
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  3. Use of modern WordPress technologies and plugins
  4. No visible security headers beyond HTTPS
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided
  7. Multiple valid contact emails provided in footer
  8. Social media presence primarily LinkedIn; other platforms mentioned but no direct links
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder and various plugins including Contact Form 7, MonsterInsights for analytics, and Chatway for live chat support. The tech stack includes modern JavaScript libraries and CSS frameworks such as Bootstrap and Owl Carousel. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. The site uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons for design consistency. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with suzanastojkovic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review suzanastojkovic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.