Skip to main content

Security report for survey-xact.dk

Xact · Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SurveyXact is a Denmark-based platform specializing in survey creation and data collection services, targeting business and professional users who require expert support. The website serves as a login portal for users, featuring a modern React and Material-UI frontend design. The platform emphasizes customer support with a clearly displayed phone number for assistance. Technically, the site uses contemporary JavaScript libraries and frameworks, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies on the login page indicates gaps in privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS usage implied but lacking visible security headers or advanced protections. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis but the professional presentation supports legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and business-oriented but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching survey-xact.dk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SurveyXact operates in the SaaS sector providing survey and data collection solutions, likely generating revenue through subscriptions or service fees. The presence of partner domains such as rambollxact.com suggests strategic partnerships enhancing market reach. The business targets organizations and professionals needing reliable survey tools, positioning itself as an expert-supported platform. The website's clean design and clear contact information support credibility. However, limited public business information and lack of WHOIS transparency reduce full confidence in business details. Growth potential exists through expanded service offerings and improved compliance visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and password inputs are properly masked. However, no security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, and there is no visible privacy or cookie policy, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trust. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. To improve, the organization should implement comprehensive security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and consider a public vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Ensure all forms have CSRF protection and validate inputs server-side to prevent injection attacks.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS data or use transparent domain registration to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Xact
Description
SurveyXact is a platform providing survey and data collection services, targeting users who need expert support in survey creation and management.
Key services
Survey creation, Data collection, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, jQuery UI 1.13.2, Material-UI (Mui components and styles)
Frameworks
React, Material-UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URL (https://)
  • Secure input types for password
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional login portal for SurveyXact service.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on login page.
  3. Contact phone number clearly provided for support.
  4. No email addresses or social media links found on this page.
  5. Use of modern frontend technologies like React and Material-UI.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including React and Material-UI, supported by jQuery and jQuery UI libraries. The design is responsive and user-friendly, with good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility is basic, with standard form labels and input fields but no advanced ARIA attributes. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the HTML content. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in SEO and accessibility could enhance overall quality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with survey-xact.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review survey-xact.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.