Skip to main content

Security report for surewriter.com

Brainstorm Force · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SureWriter is an AI-powered content generation platform developed by Brainstorm Force, designed to help businesses create personalized, high-quality content that aligns with their brand's tone and style. The platform offers a suite of tools including a personalized AI chat assistant, document editor, built-in command prompts, and collaboration features, targeting businesses of all sizes and industries. The website demonstrates a strong market position as a specialized content creation assistant with flexible and affordable pricing options. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and integrates various modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg. However, the site currently lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not serve content over HTTPS, which is a significant technical and security shortfall. Performance is moderate with a relatively slow load time, but mobile optimization and accessibility are good, and SEO practices are well implemented. From a security perspective, the site has implemented SPF and DMARC records and shows no signs of subdomain takeover or major vulnerabilities. However, the absence of HTTPS, HSTS, and OCSP stapling reduces the overall security posture. Privacy compliance is good with clear privacy and cookie policies, though no explicit consent mechanism for cookies was detected. Business credibility is supported by consistent branding, testimonials, and a bug bounty program, but direct contact emails and phone numbers are not publicly listed. Overall, SureWriter presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with excellent content and business insights but requires urgent improvements in security infrastructure, particularly SSL/TLS implementation, to enhance user trust and protect data integrity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching surewriter.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SureWriter operates in the technology sector, focusing on AI-driven content creation tools for a broad range of businesses. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized AI assistance tailored to brand voice and style, integrated document editing, and collaboration capabilities. The business model is SaaS-based, offering flexible and affordable pricing plans. The company leverages a strong partnership ecosystem with related products from Brainstorm Force and other associated platforms, enhancing its market reach. Growth indicators include active social media engagement, positive customer testimonials, and a bug bounty program indicating a commitment to security and quality. The absence of direct contact details suggests a focus on digital engagement channels.

Security posture

The security maturity of SureWriter is moderate. The presence of SPF and DMARC records indicates good email security practices, reducing the risk of spoofing. No subdomain takeover vulnerabilities were found. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS significantly undermine the security posture, exposing users to potential data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The site does not implement HSTS or OCSP stapling, missing opportunities for enhanced transport security. No explicit security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which may impact incident readiness. Overall, while some best practices are in place, critical gaps in transport security and transparency remain.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and disable outdated protocols to improve security.
  3. Configure HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options to enforce HTTPS.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate validation performance and security.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan with dedicated contact channels to enhance transparency and readiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress infrastructure using the Astra theme and Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, indicating a contemporary CMS and page builder setup. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and uses ShortPixel for image optimization. The DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing potential CDN and security benefits. However, the site suffers from a lack of valid SSL, no HTTPS, and slow load times (~6.5 seconds), which could impact user experience and SEO. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) implemented. Technical debt is moderate due to missing SSL and performance optimization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with surewriter.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review surewriter.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.