Skip to main content

Security report for surefeedback.com

SureFeedback · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SureFeedback is a technology company offering a collaborative platform designed to streamline feedback collection and communication between clients and internal teams. Positioned as a niche player in the project collaboration and feedback space, it targets freelancers, web agencies, QA teams, and marketing teams with a focus on visual feedback on images, live websites, and PDFs. The platform is delivered primarily as a WordPress plugin with multi-platform support and self-hosting options, enhancing flexibility and privacy for users. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and integrates popular marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Stripe for payments. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS significantly undermines the security posture, exposing users to potential risks. While the site demonstrates good content quality, professional design, and clear navigation, the lack of cookie consent mechanisms and some security best practices indicates areas for improvement. Overall, the business appears legitimate with consistent domain registration and a known parent company, but urgent attention to security enhancements is recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching surefeedback.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SureFeedback operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS solutions for project collaboration and client feedback. Its business model revolves around a WordPress plugin that facilitates real-time, visual feedback and task management, appealing to a broad range of digital professionals including freelancers and agencies. The company leverages a strong partnership ecosystem, including its parent company Brainstorm Force and related products like Astra Theme and CartFlows, enhancing its market reach and credibility. The presence of a money-back guarantee and extensive customer testimonials indicates a customer-centric approach and confidence in product quality. The platform's ability to integrate with various CMS and design tools positions it well for growth in the competitive collaboration software market.

Security posture

The current security posture of the SureFeedback website is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which are critical for protecting user data and ensuring secure communications. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and essential security headers such as HSTS are missing. While SPF and DMARC records are configured to protect email integrity, the overall web security is compromised. There is no evidence of a published security policy or incident response plan, which could impact trust and compliance. The use of reputable third-party services like Cloudflare for DNS and Stripe for payments is positive, but the site must address its SSL/TLS deficiencies immediately to mitigate risks of data interception and to comply with industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and configure security headers including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  5. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and several plugins including Easy Digital Downloads, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, and Presto Player. It integrates with multiple external services such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Stripe, and ConvertBox for analytics, marketing, and payment processing. The site uses Cloudflare for DNS management but lacks DNSSEC and CAA records. Performance is slow with a large page size and high resource count, which may impact user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including comprehensive meta tags and structured data. However, the lack of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. The overall infrastructure is modern but requires security and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with surefeedback.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review surefeedback.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.