Skip to main content

Security report for supsystic.com

Supsystic · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Supsystic is a well-established provider of WordPress plugins, offering a broad range of products such as data tables, galleries, pricing tables, maps, popups, and contact forms. With a significant user base and millions of downloads, the company targets WordPress website owners and developers seeking to enhance their sites' functionality. The website demonstrates professional design, rich content, and good SEO practices, supported by structured data and social media presence. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery and Bootstrap, hosted behind Cloudflare for performance and security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, though improvements like enabling DNSSEC and publishing security policies are recommended. Privacy compliance is currently limited due to missing explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business profile, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of supsystic.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching supsystic.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Supsystic holds a strong market position as a medium-sized technology company specializing in WordPress plugins. Their business model revolves around software sales and support services, targeting a global audience of WordPress users. The company benefits from a large active user base and positive reviews, which enhance its credibility. Marketing efforts include the use of Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, and other analytics tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a focus on online support channels and contact forms. No suspicious domains or partners were identified, reinforcing the company's focused operational scope.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Cloudflare services, providing a baseline of security and performance. Security best practices such as reCAPTCHA usage and absence of exposed sensitive data are positive indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security.txt, and explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represent areas for enhancement. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely security communication. Privacy compliance gaps, including missing privacy and cookie policies, expose the site to regulatory risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be improved with targeted actions.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details to improve privacy posture.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Implement explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Review and optimize tracking and marketing scripts to balance analytics needs with user privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Supsystic
Description
Provider of ultimate and best WordPress plugins including Data Tables, Gallery, Pricing Tables, Maps, Popup, Contact Forms and more to enhance WordPress website functionality.
Key services
WordPress plugins development, Plugin support and documentation, Custom work services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), Rank Math SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare for DNS and CDN
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA script

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-10897047277)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Ahrefs Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress plugin provider with a strong market presence
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and SEO optimized
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap
  4. Security posture is good but can be improved with DNSSEC and security.txt
  5. Multiple tracking and marketing tools are used with moderate user tracking
  6. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and domain age matches business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and responsive design using Bootstrap and jQuery. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, enhancing performance and security. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and Rank Math SEO plugin integration. The site includes multiple JavaScript libraries and marketing scripts such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and optimized images. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical issues or broken elements were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and privacy compliance to reduce technical debt and regulatory risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100 −3Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 70/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with supsystic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review supsystic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.