Skip to main content

Security report for supportevelina.org.uk

Evelina London · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.supportevelina.org.uk operates as an informational platform focused on reviewing and providing detailed insights about non GamStop online casinos in the UK market. It targets UK-based online gamblers seeking alternatives to GamStop-registered casinos, offering comprehensive casino reviews, bonus information, and responsible gaming advice. The site positions itself as a niche affiliate or informational resource within the online gambling sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery, Font Awesome, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS but lacks several recommended security headers and does not provide a cookie consent mechanism, which may impact privacy compliance. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable and indicates domain naming issues per Nominet UK, raising some legitimacy concerns despite the professional content and accessible website. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with room for improvement in security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching supportevelina.org.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the online gambling affiliate/informational niche, focusing on non GamStop casinos which are offshore or unregulated by the UK Gambling Commission. This niche targets a specific segment of UK gamblers seeking more flexible gambling options. The business model likely relies on affiliate commissions or advertising revenue from casino operators. The site’s content is detailed and regularly updated, indicating active content management and engagement with the gambling community. The lack of direct company contact details and limited business registration information suggests a small-scale operation. The site leverages partnerships with casino operators indirectly through affiliate links. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and integration of user reviews and ratings. Strategic observations include the need to enhance trust signals and compliance to improve user confidence and regulatory standing.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes the site to potential clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and cross-site scripting risks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site uses third-party analytics (Hotjar) without a visible cookie consent banner, which may raise GDPR compliance issues. Forms are minimal and do not appear to collect sensitive data beyond search queries and contact form submissions. Overall, the site should improve its security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness to strengthen its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance business transparency by providing verifiable company contact details and registration information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Evelina London
Description
The website provides detailed reviews and information about the top 10 best non GamStop casinos in the UK, focusing on game variety, bonuses, payment methods, and responsible gaming.
Key services
Casino reviews, Casino rankings, Gambling guides
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Font Awesome, Hotjar, Yoast SEO, Typekit Fonts
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable and indicates domain naming issues.
  3. Website focuses on non GamStop casino reviews and gambling information.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking tools.
  6. Security headers are not detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and external libraries.
  10. Content is well structured with SEO metadata and Open Graph tags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a custom theme and uses common web technologies such as jQuery 3.2.1, Font Awesome 4.7.0, and Adobe Typekit fonts. It integrates Hotjar for user behavior analytics and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The site is mobile responsive with CSS media queries and JavaScript for menu toggling on smaller screens. Performance appears moderate with multiple external CSS and JS files loaded from the same domain and CDNs. Accessibility is basic with some semantic HTML but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation. SEO is good with meta descriptions, canonical tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries detected, but security-related technical improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with supportevelina.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review supportevelina.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.