Skip to main content

Security report for supersonic.com

Supersonic · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Supersonic is a mobile game publishing platform under Unity Technologies, offering advanced technology and expert guidance to help mobile game developers maximize growth and profitability. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, OneTrust for cookie consent, and reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, providing a professional user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and standard security practices, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding a Content-Security-Policy header are recommended. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the domain is legitimate and consistent with the business claims, reflecting a mature and trustworthy online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: aspmx2.l.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching supersonic.com

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention supersonic.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
535
Employees
0
Customers
515
Third parties
20
Weak passwords
21%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for supersonic.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Supersonic targets mobile game developers and publishers, positioning itself as a leading solution within the Unity ecosystem. Its business model revolves around providing publishing services and growth technology, leveraging Unity's brand and infrastructure. The website content and design reflect a large enterprise with professional branding and consistent messaging. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a focus on digital engagement via forms. The use of advanced analytics and cookie consent tools indicates a mature approach to marketing and compliance. No suspicious domains or partners were identified, reinforcing the company's credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA on forms, and cookie consent via OneTrust. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No Content-Security-Policy header was detected, which is a recommended best practice to mitigate cross-site scripting attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from additional hardening and disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to reduce risk of cross-site scripting attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Consider providing direct contact information for security or abuse reporting to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Supersonic
Description
Supersonic is Unity’s mobile game publishing solution offering industry-leading technology and expert guidance to maximize game growth.
Key services
mobile game publishing, growth maximization technology, expert guidance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, reCAPTCHA, Bootstrap Grid, Custom CSS and JS bundles
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent via OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with modern SEO and privacy tools
  3. Has clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. No direct company emails or phone numbers found, contact via forms only
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  8. Domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar
  9. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses jQuery, Bootstrap grid, and various JavaScript bundles for UI and functionality. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and analytics are handled by Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics. Cookie consent is managed by OneTrust, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS servers. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility basics. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized assets. There is room for improvement in security headers and DNS configuration to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with supersonic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review supersonic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.