Skip to main content

Security report for superangel.io

Superangel OU · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Superangel OU operates as an early stage venture capital fund and company builder focused on technology startups in the Baltics and Nordics. The company targets tech founders raising pre-seed or seed rounds, offering investment tickets typically between €300k and €1M. Their business model centers on leveraging entrepreneurial experience and networks to support scalable tech ventures in AI, robotics, logistics, fintech, and SaaS sectors. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging and portfolio highlights, positioning Superangel as a niche regional VC player with a strong founder-centric approach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO practices including Yoast SEO and structured data (JSON-LD). It uses common web technologies such as jQuery, GSAP for animations, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. No hosting provider is explicitly identified, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain status clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, security headers are not detected, and there is no visible cookie consent mechanism or published security/incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing a domain registered in Estonia since 2017 under the company name Superangel OU, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates a good balance of business credibility, technical implementation, and content quality. Privacy compliance could be improved by adding cookie consent and more explicit GDPR-related disclosures. Security posture would benefit from enhanced HTTP headers and published policies. The risk level is low, with no critical issues detected, making the site trustworthy for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching superangel.io

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Superangel OU is positioned as a specialized early stage VC fund targeting tech startups in the Baltic and Nordic regions. Their competitive advantage lies in being founded and run by tech entrepreneurs, offering not just capital but also operational support and network access. The business model focuses on pre-seed and seed investments in high-growth tech sectors such as AI, robotics, fintech, and logistics. Revenue streams likely come from equity stakes in portfolio companies. The company showcases a curated portfolio and team, indicating active engagement and credibility. Their marketing channels include a professional website, social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn, and curated resources like investor databases and community events. Growth indicators include recent portfolio news and strategic funding announcements. The partnership ecosystem includes links to portfolio companies and media coverage, enhancing market visibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. No forms with sensitive inputs were detected, reducing attack surface. The use of common libraries like jQuery and GSAP appears up to date with no known vulnerabilities in the versions used. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing/informational site but could be improved to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security HTTP headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy Directive requirements.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Superangel OU
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Superangel OU
Description
Superangel is an early stage investment fund and company builder focused on AI & Robotics, Logistics & Mobility, FinTech & SaaS in the Baltics and Nordics.
Key services
Early stage funding, Company building, Network leverage
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, GSAP
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. Clear business focus on early stage VC funding in tech sector.
  4. Good use of SEO and structured data.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.8.1, using Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization. It leverages Google Fonts, jQuery 3.7.1, GSAP 3.10.4 for animations, and Google Analytics with Tag Manager for user tracking. The site uses responsive design techniques and custom CSS for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Structured data in JSON-LD format is implemented for SEO and rich snippets. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence suitable for the business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with superangel.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review superangel.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.