Skip to main content

Security report for suns.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website suns.lv currently presents only a placeholder 'Please wait' page with minimal content and a meta refresh redirect. This indicates that the full website content is either blocked or undergoing optimization, likely due to a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security challenge mechanism. No business information, contact details, or policies are accessible, limiting the ability to assess the company's market position or services. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with basic HTML, CSS, and SVG usage but lacks modern frameworks or CMS indicators. Security posture is weak with only a basic Content-Security-Policy header detected and no evidence of HTTPS or other security headers. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing verification of domain registration details. Overall, the site is inaccessible for comprehensive analysis, resulting in a low trust and security score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching suns.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and absence of business-related information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain suns.lv does not reveal any company name, sector, or operational details. No external or partner domains are linked, and no contact or social media channels are provided. This lack of transparency and information suggests either a new or inactive site or one protected behind security measures that prevent public access.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal and insufficient for a public-facing website. Only a Content-Security-Policy header is present, with no indication of HTTPS enforcement or other critical security headers. The absence of forms or interactive elements reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement. The presence of a WAF or security challenge page suggests some level of protection, but the inability to access full content hinders security evaluation. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating a gap in security transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Provide clear and accessible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with regulations and build user trust.
  3. Publish contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user support.
  4. Enhance security headers beyond CSP, including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  5. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and accurate to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page content is a minimal placeholder with a 'Please wait' message and meta refresh, indicating a WAF or security challenge blocking full content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
No business description available; page is a placeholder with a wait message.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
SVG, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Content-Security-Policy present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked or limited to a placeholder wait page.
  2. No business or contact information is available on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies detected.
  4. No forms or interactive elements detected.
  5. No external links or social media links found.
  6. Minimal security headers present; no HTTPS information available.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  8. Likely presence of a WAF or security mechanism blocking full content.
  9. No evidence of adult or unsafe content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves a minimal HTML page with embedded SVG graphics and inline CSS. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks, CMS platforms, or analytics tools. The page uses a meta refresh redirect, which is often indicative of a temporary or security-related holding page. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic due to minimal content and structure. SEO optimization is poor as no meta tags beyond description and viewport are present, and no structured data or Open Graph tags are found. The lack of external links or scripts reduces complexity but also limits functionality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with suns.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review suns.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.