Skip to main content

Security report for sunosama.org

Private Registry Authority · Other · Australia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website sunosama.org represents a niche cultural and linguistic community project focused on international choirbooks supporting languages such as Esperanto, Guosa, and Tokipona. It provides free downloadable choirbook PDFs and promotes collaboration among language communities. The site is small-scale and non-commercial, targeting enthusiasts and speakers of these constructed and minority languages. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies like Bootstrap and Google Fonts, hosted on Vodien infrastructure. However, it lacks advanced SEO, accessibility features, and comprehensive privacy or security policies. Security posture is minimal with no DNSSEC and no visible security headers. The WHOIS data shows privacy protection but contains a suspicious domain creation date in the future, which reduces trust. Overall, the site is safe, with no adult or malicious content detected, but lacks business transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sunosama.org

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates as a cultural initiative rather than a commercial business, focusing on linguistic community support and free content distribution. Its market position is niche with limited audience reach. The absence of contact details and formal policies suggests a low maturity level in business operations. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is consistent with small community projects. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The site’s revenue model is unclear, likely relying on voluntary support or community contributions.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement details, security headers, and incident response information. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit monitoring capabilities. The domain’s future creation date in WHOIS is suspicious and should be investigated. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from improved security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with strict transport security and ensure SSL configuration is robust.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect domain integrity.
  3. Add privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Publish contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and security readiness.
  5. Review and correct WHOIS domain creation date to ensure legitimacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private Registry Authority
Description
The website presents 'suno sama' as an international community choirbook project, supporting multiple languages including Esperanto, Guosa, and Tokipona. It highlights collaboration among language communities and credits composer Navid Lancaster for music rights. The site offers free downloadable choirbook PDFs for mariners and lists ISBNs for various language editions.
Key services
Provision of choirbooks in multiple languages, Promotion of international language collaboration, Free downloadable choirbook PDFs
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3, Google Fonts, Custom font-face (nasin-nanpa)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. No security or incident response policies visible.
  5. Website uses modern CSS framework Bootstrap and Google Fonts.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  8. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and suspicious future creation date.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Website is a niche cultural project with limited business information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3 and Google Fonts, indicating a modern frontend stack. Hosting is via Vodien, a known provider. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts detected. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO is minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present. No CMS or backend technology is identified. The site does not use analytics or marketing tools, which reduces tracking but also limits business insights. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in SEO, accessibility, and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sunosama.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sunosama.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.