Skip to main content

Security report for sunhut.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website sunhut.com is currently a parked domain with no active business content or services. The page primarily serves as a placeholder indicating the domain is for sale, with advertising scripts from Google and AdsDeli embedded. There is no identifiable company information, contact details, or privacy compliance mechanisms beyond a basic privacy policy popup. The domain is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC since 2003 and is stable but not actively used for business purposes. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and JavaScript with Google Adsense domains CAF scripts for monetization. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, and no forms or user input fields are present. The site is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks SEO and accessibility features. Advertising and tracking scripts are present, but no analytics services are explicitly detected. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers is a significant weakness. The lack of privacy and cookie policies and no contact or incident response information further reduce trustworthiness. The domain's WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate for a parked domain but does not indicate an active business. Overall, the site poses low risk but also low trust and credibility. It is recommended to enable HTTPS, add security headers, provide clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and include contact information if the domain is to be actively used. Until then, it remains a parked domain with minimal content and poor user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sunhut.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sunhut.com operates as a domain parking and resale entity with no active business operations or services. The domain has been registered since 2003, indicating long-term ownership likely for investment or resale purposes. The business model is focused on monetizing the domain through advertising networks such as Google Adsense and AdsDeli. There is no evidence of direct customer engagement, product offerings, or service delivery. The target audience is general internet users who may be interested in purchasing the domain. The lack of business information, contact details, or certifications suggests minimal operational maturity or market presence. Partnerships appear limited to advertising networks and the domain registrar. Growth indicators and strategic positioning are not applicable given the domain's parked status.

Security posture

The security posture of sunhut.com is weak. The site lacks HTTPS/SSL encryption, exposing visitors to potential interception risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. There are no visible forms or inputs, reducing attack surface but also indicating no user interaction. Privacy compliance is minimal with only a basic privacy policy linked via popup and no cookie consent mechanism. Incident response and security policies are absent. The domain registration is stable and legitimate, but the site itself does not demonstrate active security best practices. Overall, the site is low risk due to limited functionality but should improve security controls if activated for business use.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms.
  4. Add clear contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Remove or limit third-party advertising and tracking scripts to enhance privacy and performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
This domain appears to be a parked domain with a placeholder page indicating it may be for sale.
Key services
domain parking, domain resale
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, Google Adsense Domains CAF, Google Ads, GoDaddy Parking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, AdsDeli
Tracking pixels
Google Adsense Domains CAF, AdsDeli tracking scripts
Marketing tools
Google Ads, AdsDeli
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain with no active business content.
  2. No contact information or business details provided.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy except a basic privacy policy popup.
  4. Heavy use of advertising and tracking scripts from Google and AdsDeli.
  5. No HTTPS or security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. No forms or user input fields present.
  7. No social media or external business links except advertising and domain registrar.
  8. Domain is stable and long-registered but not actively used for business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and JavaScript, relying heavily on third-party advertising scripts from Google Adsense and AdsDeli. The domain is hosted via GoDaddy parking servers with no CMS or advanced frameworks detected. Performance is moderate but limited by external ad scripts. Mobile optimization is basic with responsive viewport meta tag but minimal styling. SEO is poor due to lack of meaningful content and meta tags beyond a simple description. Accessibility features are minimal. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, which are critical technical deficits. There is no evidence of modern web frameworks or platforms. The technical debt is low due to simplicity but modernization is needed for active use.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sunhut.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sunhut.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.