Skip to main content

Security report for sun.com

Oracle · Technology · United States

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oracle's website for hardware solutions presents a comprehensive and professional digital presence showcasing its enterprise-grade hardware products optimized for Oracle Database and cloud integration. The site targets IT professionals and enterprises seeking scalable, high-performance infrastructure solutions. The content is rich, well-structured, and supported by multimedia and customer success stories, reflecting Oracle's strong market position in technology and cloud services. Technically, the site leverages Oracle's own content management system, Akamai CDN, and modern JavaScript frameworks, ensuring good performance and accessibility. However, a critical security gap exists due to the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and HTTPS support, which significantly impacts the security posture and trustworthiness from a technical perspective. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented with consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR compliance. Overall, the site demonstrates high business credibility but requires urgent remediation of its SSL configuration to meet modern security standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sun.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oracle operates as a leading global technology enterprise with a diversified portfolio including hardware, cloud infrastructure, and software solutions. The hardware segment focuses on engineered systems, servers, and storage optimized for Oracle Database workloads. The business model emphasizes integrated full-stack solutions that reduce operational complexity and costs for enterprises. Oracle's market position is reinforced by strong branding, extensive customer success stories, and analyst endorsements. The company targets large enterprises across multiple sectors, leveraging cloud integration to enhance product offerings. The website reflects a mature digital marketing strategy with global reach and localized content. Partnerships and integrations with cloud providers and technology platforms further strengthen Oracle's ecosystem.

Security posture

The website implements several security best practices including content security policies, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-XSS-Protection headers, which help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. Cookies are set with Secure and HttpOnly flags, enhancing session security. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical vulnerability that undermines user trust and exposes data to interception. The lack of HSTS and OCSP stapling further weakens the SSL/TLS security posture. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content or scripts. Incident response contact information is not explicitly provided, which could be improved to enhance security transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and enforce HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  4. Provide explicit security incident response contact information (e.g., security@oracle.com or abuse@oracle.com).
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and cookie settings to maintain best practices.
  6. Enhance transparency by publishing vulnerability disclosure and data protection officer information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Oracle's FutureTense Content Server platform with a Redwood2 framework, utilizing modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery. It is hosted on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure and delivered via Akamai CDN, ensuring global reach and performance optimization. The site includes SEO best practices such as meta tags, Open Graph tags, JSON-LD structured data, and hreflang for internationalization. Accessibility features and responsive design are well implemented. Performance metrics are moderate, with room for improvement in load times and resource optimization. The absence of HTTPS is a significant technical risk that must be addressed to protect data integrity and user privacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sun.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sun.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.