Skip to main content

Security report for summitprintingpro.com

Summit Printing LLC · Other · United States

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Summit Printing LLC operates as an established online commercial printing company founded in 2010, offering a wide range of printing services including banners, brochures, business cards, mailing services, and graphic design. The company targets businesses and graphic designers across the United States and Canada, leveraging multiple plant locations to provide fast production and free shipping. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its audience. Technically, the site uses PHP 7.0.33, jQuery, Modernizr, and is hosted behind Cloudflare with LiteSpeed server technology. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS implementation is a significant security shortfall. Security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are present, but the lack of TLS protocols and certificate transparency compliance reduces the overall security posture. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site scores moderately on content quality and business credibility but is penalized heavily for security deficiencies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching summitprintingpro.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a trusted online printer with a 100% quality guarantee and personalized service. Its business model focuses on online ordering with nationwide plant locations enabling rapid fulfillment and shipping. The target customer segments include businesses and graphic designers seeking high-quality color printing services. The company leverages Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The domain is mature and well-protected, registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC, supporting legitimacy. However, the outdated PHP version and lack of HTTPS may pose operational risks. No social media presence or certifications were detected, suggesting opportunities for enhanced marketing and trust-building.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is critical for protecting user data and ensuring secure transactions. While some security headers are implemented, the lack of modern TLS protocols, OCSP stapling, and session resumption indicates incomplete security hardening. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The use of an outdated PHP version (7.0.33) further increases risk exposure. These factors collectively reduce the security score and expose the business to potential threats such as data interception and injection attacks. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and updating server software are recommended to improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Upgrade PHP to a supported and secure version to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  5. Enhance security by enabling modern TLS protocols, OCSP stapling, and session resumption.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on PHP 7.0.33 with client-side libraries including jQuery and Modernizr. It is hosted behind Cloudflare and served via LiteSpeed web server. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The HTML and CSS are valid and the site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. However, the lack of HTTPS and outdated backend technology represent technical debt and security risks. Performance data is unavailable, but the use of LiteSpeed and Cloudflare suggests potential for good performance if properly configured. SEO is supported by meta tags and canonical links. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with summitprintingpro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review summitprintingpro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.