Skip to main content

Security report for suitebox.com

Apache2 Debian Default Page: It works · Other · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website suitebox.com currently serves only the default Apache2 Debian welcome page, indicating that no active business content or services are deployed. The domain is registered but lacks DNS records and SSL/TLS configuration, resulting in an unsecured HTTP-only site with minimal technical setup. There are no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor any contact or business information available on the site. This suggests the domain is either unused, under maintenance, or abandoned. From a technical perspective, the site runs on Apache 2.4.59 on Debian Linux but lacks modern web technologies, performance optimizations, or mobile responsiveness. The absence of DNS A and MX records and SSL certificate severely impacts security and trustworthiness. No security headers or best practices are implemented, exposing the site to potential risks if content were added. Security posture is poor with critical issues including no HTTPS, no DNS configuration, and no security policies. The lack of business information and trust indicators further reduces credibility. Overall, the site is not suitable for business operations in its current state and requires significant improvements to meet basic security, privacy, and usability standards. Strategic recommendations include installing a valid SSL certificate, configuring DNS records properly, replacing the default page with actual business content, implementing privacy and cookie policies, and adding security headers to improve protection and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching suitebox.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
15
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Currently, suitebox.com does not present any business intelligence data or content. There is no information about company name, services, market positioning, or partnerships. The domain appears inactive or in initial setup phase with no visible business model or target audience. Without DNS records or SSL, the domain lacks credibility and operational readiness. No revenue streams, customer segments, or growth indicators are discernible from the site. The absence of contact details and policies further limits any business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The security posture of suitebox.com is critically weak. The site lacks HTTPS entirely, serving content over unsecured HTTP only. No SSL certificate is installed, and no TLS protocols or cipher suites are enabled. Security headers such as HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection are missing. DNS records are absent, which may affect domain legitimacy and email security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site does not comply with GDPR or other privacy regulations due to missing policies. Overall, the site is vulnerable to interception, spoofing, and lacks basic security hygiene.

Recommendations

  1. Install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure communications.
  2. Configure DNS records including A, MX, NS, and TXT to establish domain legitimacy and support email services.
  3. Replace the default Apache welcome page with actual business content and provide clear contact information.
  4. Implement privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache 2.4.59 server running on Debian Linux. The HTTP headers indicate a basic default configuration with no advanced security or performance optimizations. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The site lacks DNS A, AAAA, MX, NS, and TXT records, indicating incomplete domain setup. SSL/TLS is not configured, and no modern TLS protocols or cipher suites are enabled. The page content is minimal, consisting solely of the default Apache2 Debian welcome page HTML. Performance metrics are zero, indicating no resources or page size data available. The site is not mobile optimized and lacks accessibility and SEO features. Overall, the technical implementation is minimal and outdated.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with suitebox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review suitebox.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.