Skip to main content

Security report for sudetype.com

Sudetype · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sudetype is a Czech-based digital type foundry and graphic design studio specializing in typefaces, lettering, posters, and corporate identities. Established in 2011, the company targets designers and businesses seeking custom typography and visual branding solutions. Their business model combines creative services with digital product sales, including custom fonts and design projects. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content in Czech and English. Technically, the website uses jQuery 1.10.2 and the Slick carousel library, hosted likely via the registrar Gransy, s.r.o. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is adequately addressed through meta tags and structured navigation. However, the technology stack includes an outdated jQuery version, which may pose security risks. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is present. The contact method is primarily a web form without direct email or phone contacts. Privacy and terms of service pages exist but no cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating partial privacy compliance. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained with a legitimacy score of 90 based on WHOIS and content consistency. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and library updates. Privacy compliance is basic, and no critical vulnerabilities or adult content are detected. Strategic improvements in security and privacy policies would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sudetype.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sudetype.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sudetype.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sudetype operates in a niche creative sector focusing on typography and graphic design. Their competitive advantage lies in custom typeface creation and tailored visual identity services. Revenue streams likely include direct sales of fonts and commissioned design projects. The target customers are design professionals and businesses requiring unique branding solutions. The company maintains a small size with a focused portfolio and active social media presence, including Mastodon, Instagram, and Facebook. Partnerships with font resellers like Fontspring and MyFonts expand their market reach. The business shows stable growth indicators with a domain age of over a decade and consistent branding. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The security maturity of Sudetype's website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces protection against DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Data collection is limited to a contact form without visible advanced protections such as CAPTCHA or input sanitization indicators. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and documented policies to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current secure versions.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sudetype
Description
Digital type foundry and graphic design studio Sudetype — typefaces, letterings, posters, corporate identities & much more.
Key services
Visual identity design, Custom typeface creation, Books and brochures design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Slick carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with English option.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy banner detected, but privacy policy and terms exist on separate pages.
  4. Contact is primarily via a detailed contact form; no direct email or phone number visible.
  5. Social media presence includes Mastodon, Instagram, and Facebook.
  6. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Uses older jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided content.
  9. No explicit or adult content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5 and CSS, enhanced by jQuery 1.10.2 and the Slick carousel plugin for interactive elements. The site uses custom CSS files and inline styles for branding colors and layout. Hosting appears to be managed by the registrar Gransy, s.r.o., a Czech company. Performance is moderate with some client-side scripting for UI interactions and responsive design. Mobile optimization is good, with viewport meta tags and responsive sliders. Accessibility is basic, with some semantic HTML but no ARIA roles or advanced accessibility features detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph properties, improving social media sharing. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications, suggesting a custom or static site architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sudetype.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sudetype.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.