Skip to main content

Security report for sucesusp.org.br

SucesuSP · Technology · Brazil

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SucesuSP is a well-established technology user society based in São Paulo, Brazil, with a history dating back to 1967. The organization focuses on fostering technological development, digital transformation, and innovation through networking, educational events, and interest groups in areas such as cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and IoT. Their business model revolves around membership and partnerships, providing value to technology professionals and companies in the region. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, but suffers from performance issues and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which poses security risks. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism indicates some level of privacy compliance, though no explicit privacy or security policies are found. Overall, the security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, exposing the site to potential risks. Strategic improvements in security infrastructure and policy transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sucesusp.org.br

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SucesuSP holds a strong market position as a leading technology user society in São Paulo, leveraging decades of experience and partnerships with major technology providers like Google Cloud. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive network of professionals and companies, active interest groups, and continuous educational offerings. The organization targets IT professionals, enterprises, and stakeholders interested in emerging technologies and digital transformation. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, event sponsorships, and partnerships. Growth indicators include active content updates, social media engagement, and collaboration with recognized institutions. The partnership ecosystem is a key strategic asset, supporting innovation and technology adoption in the local market.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of SucesuSP's website is low. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocols significantly undermine secure communications. No security headers or advanced configurations like HSTS or OCSP stapling are implemented. While a cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating awareness of privacy regulations, no privacy policy or incident response information is available, creating compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. The lack of a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy further limits transparency and incident management readiness. These vulnerabilities could impact business operations by exposing user data and damaging organizational reputation. Enhancing security controls and compliance documentation is critical to improving the security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols and disable outdated SSL/TLS versions.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  4. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Publish comprehensive privacy and security policies, including GDPR compliance statements.
  6. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file.
  7. Improve website performance by optimizing resources and reducing page size.
  8. Enhance accessibility and mobile optimization to improve user experience.
  9. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize security risks.
  10. Increase transparency around data collection, retention, and incident response procedures.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern but common technology stack. It integrates HubSpot for analytics and marketing automation. The site suffers from slow load times (over 15 seconds) and a large page size (~1.1 MB), which could degrade user experience. No DNS records were detected in the provided data, which may indicate incomplete DNS configuration or scanning limitations. The SSL configuration is invalid with no TLS protocols enabled, representing a critical technical risk. The site uses multiple external resources including Google Fonts and FontAwesome icons. There is room for modernization by improving SSL/TLS setup, optimizing performance, and enhancing security headers and policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sucesusp.org.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sucesusp.org.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.