Skip to main content

Security report for submitsaas.com

SubmitSaaS · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SubmitSaaS is a specialized service that helps SaaS companies increase their online visibility by submitting their products to over 100 curated directories. The company offers fast delivery within 48 hours, detailed reporting, and a focus on quality backlinks to improve SEO. Their market position is niche but well-defined, targeting SaaS startups and businesses seeking to boost their domain authority and organic traffic. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, comprehensive FAQs, and transparent pricing models, reflecting a mature digital presence despite the company's recent founding in 2024. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as SvelteKit and leverages Cloudflare DNS for hosting and performance. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and uses structured data to enhance SEO. Analytics tools like Beam Analytics and Ahrefs are integrated for tracking user behavior and SEO metrics. However, some security best practices such as DNSSEC and security headers are not implemented, and there is no cookie consent mechanism, which may affect GDPR compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of a formal security policy or incident response contact is a gap that could be addressed to improve trust and compliance. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing a recent domain registration aligned with the company's founding date. Overall, SubmitSaaS presents a trustworthy and professional service with strong business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency would further enhance their security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching submitsaas.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SubmitSaaS operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS marketing services through directory submissions. Their competitive advantage lies in the speed of delivery (48 hours), comprehensive reporting, and curated high-quality directories. The business model is service-based with one-time payment packages targeting small to medium SaaS companies. Revenue streams come from tiered pricing packages including basic, standard, and AI SaaS-specific offerings. The target customers are SaaS startups and AI SaaS providers looking to improve SEO and brand visibility. The company maintains an active social media presence on Twitter and uses Google Sheets for transparent reporting. Partnerships with payment processors like DodoPayments are evident. Growth indicators include detailed client testimonials and case studies showing significant domain rating improvements. The company emphasizes automation combined with human review to maintain quality and efficiency.

Security posture

The security maturity of SubmitSaaS is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer protection to prevent unauthorized changes. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security hardening. No incident response or security policy pages are present, which limits transparency and preparedness for security events. Data protection practices are basic, with no visible cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanisms. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no sensitive data exposure was detected. The security culture appears to prioritize operational efficiency and customer transparency but could benefit from formalized security governance and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and customer trust.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SubmitSaaS
Description
Increase your SaaS visibility by submitting to 100+ directories. Save time, gain high-quality backlinks, and grow your reach with minimal effort.
Key services
Directory submissions to 100+ SaaS and AI directories, Backlink building, SEO improvement, Detailed submission reporting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, SvelteKit, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
SvelteKit
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Beam Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Beam Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Marketing tools
Google Sheets for reporting
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a clear and professional SaaS directory submission service
  2. Strong use of structured data and SEO best practices
  3. Good transparency with pricing, FAQs, and reporting examples
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  5. No phone contact found, only email and social media
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected, potential GDPR compliance gap
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (SvelteKit) with a custom CMS approach, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile responsiveness. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS, providing reliability and some security benefits. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) extensively for SEO and rich snippets, including organization info and FAQ schema. External integrations include Beam Analytics and Ahrefs for tracking and SEO analysis. The site has a clean design with clear navigation and multiple CTAs for conversion. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security configurations and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with submitsaas.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review submitsaas.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.