Skip to main content

Security report for stylishwp.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

StylishWP is a small business specializing in the sale of professional WordPress themes and plugins. The website targets WordPress users and developers seeking responsive and easy-to-use digital products to enhance their websites. The business appears to have been established in 2014, with a domain registration consistent with a mature small enterprise. The website uses WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The technical infrastructure is standard for WordPress-based e-commerce sites, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and does not enable DNSSEC, which could improve domain security. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service, which are critical for compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers is not explicitly provided, limiting direct communication channels. Overall, the security posture is basic, with HTTPS enabled but missing several best practices. The site is safe for general audiences, with no adult or explicit content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stylishwp.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

StylishWP operates in the technology sector, focusing on WordPress themes and plugins, a niche market with steady demand. The business model is e-commerce-based, selling digital products directly to consumers. The lack of visible contact information and policies may impact customer trust and compliance. The company leverages popular WordPress plugins like WooCommerce and Yoast SEO, indicating a standard approach to digital sales and marketing. The domain age and registrar information support legitimacy, but the absence of detailed business credentials or certifications limits the assessment of market position and growth. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data. The website content is basic but relevant to its target audience.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options are detected, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. There is no evidence of incident response policies, vulnerability disclosure programs, or security certifications. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing compliance and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer trust.
  5. Develop and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Our professional WordPress Themes and Plugins are beautiful, simply to use, responsive, beautiful and with our services you will have the look you search.
Key services
WordPress Themes, WordPress Plugins, Professional services related to WordPress design
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Yoast SEO
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO plugin
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage HTML.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in HTML content.
  4. Website uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Yoast SEO plugin.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled but no detailed config available.
  6. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Content is focused on WordPress themes and plugins sales.
  8. No social media links or company emails found in HTML content.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is registered since 2014 with expiry in 2026.
  10. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce and Yoast SEO for search optimization, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. The site appears to be moderately performant with good mobile optimization, but accessibility features are basic. The domain is registered with NameCheap, Inc., a reputable registrar, and has a long registration period, which supports stability. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security practices. The website lacks structured data such as JSON-LD for enhanced SEO and rich results. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom platforms beyond WordPress and its plugins. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard but could benefit from modernization in security and compliance aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stylishwp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stylishwp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.