Skip to main content

Security report for studioteika.com

TEIKA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TEIKA is a small graphic design studio specializing in brand transformation through creative and versatile design concepts tailored for companies and individuals. The website showcases a portfolio of diverse projects, indicating a focus on quality and creativity within the graphic design industry. The business model centers on providing bespoke design solutions, positioning TEIKA as a niche player in the creative services market primarily serving clients in Latvia and potentially beyond. Technically, the website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Typekit and Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile-optimized with good performance and basic accessibility features. SSL is properly configured with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, ensuring secure communications. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and does not display privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a solid baseline with HTTPS and HSTS but misses several best practices such as security headers and formal privacy compliance documentation. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a concern, as it reduces transparency and trustworthiness, although the professional nature of the site content mitigates some risk. No signs of malware, phishing, or vulnerabilities were detected in the visible content. Overall, TEIKA presents as a professional and creative business with a well-designed online presence but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, clearer business information, and improved security practices to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching studioteika.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TEIKA operates as a creative graphic design studio focusing on brand transformation services. Its market positioning is that of a boutique agency targeting companies and individuals seeking innovative design solutions. The business model is service-oriented, relying on project-based engagements showcased through a portfolio. The presence on social media platforms like Instagram, LinkedIn, and Behance supports marketing and client engagement efforts. The lack of detailed business registration or physical address information limits transparency but is common for small creative agencies. Growth indicators include a diverse portfolio and active social media presence. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate. HTTPS and HSTS are properly implemented, ensuring encrypted data transmission. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which may expose the business to compliance risks under GDPR or similar regulations. There is no evidence of an incident response plan or security contact information. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but requires improvements to meet higher security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve the absence of WHOIS registration data to enhance domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TEIKA
Description
Graphic design studio that transforms brands by implementing creative, versatile design concepts and solutions for companies and individuals.
Key services
Graphic design, Brand transformation, Creative design concepts, Design solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Typekit fonts, Google Fonts, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • HSTS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional graphic design portfolio hosted on Squarespace.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information limited to a single email address in the footer.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  6. Social media presence includes Instagram, LinkedIn, and Behance links.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. HTTPS and HSTS are enabled, indicating good SSL configuration.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Squarespace defaults.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, a reputable platform providing managed hosting and CMS capabilities. The tech stack includes modern web standards such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and web fonts via Typekit and Google Fonts. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses preconnect hints for performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Cards are properly configured. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies were detected. Performance is moderate, typical for a Squarespace site with rich media content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with studioteika.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review studioteika.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.