Skip to main content

Security report for studiostillsoft.com

Studio StillSoft · Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Studio StillSoft is a small creative or digital studio established around 2020, focusing on showcasing selected projects through a minimalistic website design. The business appears to target a general audience interested in creative digital services, positioning itself as a niche player in the creative industry. The website is simple and visually oriented, with limited textual content and no explicit business or contact details visible on the homepage. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript modules and CSS with a probable Vue.js framework, hosted on Websupport infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and moderately performant but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or third-party marketing/analytics tools are detected, indicating a lightweight and straightforward technical setup. From a security perspective, the site lacks critical security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms such as privacy or cookie policies. The domain registration is legitimate and consistent with the business profile, but the absence of security best practices and contact information reduces trustworthiness. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, and the site content is safe for general audiences. Overall, the website scores moderately on content and business credibility but scores low on security and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching studiostillsoft.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Studio StillSoft operates as a small creative studio with a portfolio-driven business model. The company likely generates revenue through project-based creative services. The market positioning is niche, targeting clients seeking bespoke digital or creative projects. The absence of detailed business information or partner domains limits deeper business intelligence. The company is relatively new, founded in 2020, and appears to maintain a lean operational footprint with no visible subsidiaries or partnerships. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The current security posture of Studio StillSoft is basic and lacks several important controls. The website does not implement common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, which are essential for protecting against common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, reducing transparency and readiness for security events. The domain registration is clean and consistent, but the technical security measures on the website itself require significant improvement to reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security or abuse contacts to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Studio StillSoft
Description
Studio StillSoft appears to be a creative or digital studio showcasing selected projects and providing contact information. The website is minimalistic and focused on presenting the studio's work visually.
Key services
creative projects, digital studio services
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Vue.js (inferred from data-v-app attribute)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is minimalistic with limited content and no privacy or cookie policies.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the main page.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage content provided.
  4. No social media links or external marketing/analytics scripts detected.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. Domain registration is valid and consistent with business profile.
  7. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript ES modules and CSS, likely built with Vue.js framework as indicated by the data-v-app attribute. The hosting provider is Websupport, inferred from the domain's nameservers. The site is mobile optimized and loads a minimal set of assets, contributing to moderate performance. However, the site lacks advanced SEO meta tags beyond basic viewport and favicon links. No CMS or third-party analytics/tracking tools are detected, indicating a simple and static site architecture. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected in the provided HTML snippet. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from enhancements in SEO, accessibility, and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with studiostillsoft.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review studiostillsoft.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.