StudiosDigital GmbH is a small Austrian technology agency specializing in interactive media and Drupal-based web development. The company targets businesses and organizations in Vienna and Austria seeking professional web presence and digital solutions. Their website reflects a consistent branding and professional content focused on Drupal 7 CMS projects and interactive media services. Technically, the site runs on Drupal 7 with jQuery and nginx but lacks modern security practices such as HTTPS, which is a critical vulnerability. The absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates GDPR compliance gaps. Social media integration is present but no advanced analytics or marketing tools are detected. Overall, the website is functional but requires urgent security upgrades and privacy compliance improvements to meet modern standards.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
Critical
No HTTPS encryption
GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
31
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention studiosdigital.at, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for studiosdigital.at right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company operates as a specialized Drupal agency with a project and service-oriented business model. Their market position is focused on the Austrian technology sector, particularly in web development and interactive media. The website showcases multiple client projects, indicating active business operations and a portfolio-driven approach. The lack of advanced marketing or analytics tools suggests a focus on direct client engagement rather than broad digital marketing. The company maintains social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, and Flickr, supporting brand visibility. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated, suggesting an independent small business structure.
Security posture
The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and SSL certificates, exposing users to potential data interception risks. Security headers are minimal, with only X-Frame-Options present. No advanced security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures are published. The site does not implement cookie consent or privacy banners, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. The lack of TLS protocols and session resumption mechanisms further weakens security. Immediate remediation is recommended to implement HTTPS, enhance security headers, and establish privacy and incident response policies.
Recommendations
Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide to secure user data and improve trust.
Add a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR compliance.
Enhance security headers by adding Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
Publish an incident response policy with dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
Upgrade Drupal core and modules regularly to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve platform security.
The website is built on Drupal 7, a mature but aging CMS platform, with multiple contributed modules and custom theming. The server runs nginx but lacks HTTPS support, which is a major technical deficiency. Performance data is unavailable but inferred to be slow due to chunked transfer encoding and lack of optimization indicators. The site includes multiple CSS and JS assets, including jQuery and colorbox libraries. Mobile optimization is basic with some legacy IE support scripts. SEO and accessibility features are minimal but present. The technical stack is functional but requires modernization and security hardening to reduce technical debt and operational risks.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with studiosdigital.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review studiosdigital.at.