Skip to main content

Security report for studiogazoline.com

Studio gazoline · Other · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Studio Gazoline is a well-established communication agency based in Montpellier, France, with over 20 years of experience in digital marketing, website creation, SEO, and graphic design. The company targets businesses seeking comprehensive communication and digital marketing services, primarily in the Montpellier region and nearby cities. Their service portfolio includes communication strategy, SEO, web development using popular CMS and frameworks, webmarketing, and visual communication. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with strong trust indicators such as client logos and certifications. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 and leverages modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Accordion-js. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes reCAPTCHA for form protection and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, although the website content and business information appear legitimate. Overall, Studio Gazoline presents a strong digital presence with good technical and marketing capabilities. The main risk area is the lack of WHOIS transparency and some missing security best practices. Addressing these gaps would enhance trust and security posture significantly.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching studiogazoline.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention studiogazoline.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
86
Employees
6
Customers
3
Third parties
77
Weak passwords
23%

Latest record dated 2026-05-27 · 5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for studiogazoline.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –webmail.studiogazoline.com2026-05-27
  • –studiogazoline.com2026-01-13
  • –vimbadmin.studiogazoline.com2025-08-30
  • –webmail.studiogazoline.com2025-08-19
  • –webmail.studiogazoline.com2025-07-22

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Studio Gazoline operates as a small-sized, essential entity in the communication and digital marketing sector, focusing on integrated services combining print and digital media. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing experience, multidisciplinary team, and ability to deliver both creative and technical solutions in-house. The business model is service-oriented, targeting SMEs and organizations in Montpellier and surrounding regions. Revenue streams likely include consulting, project-based web development, SEO services, and digital marketing campaigns. The company maintains active social media channels and showcases client projects and certifications, indicating a healthy partnership ecosystem and market presence. Growth indicators include diversified service offerings and a focus on strategic communication and marketing performance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced, use of Google reCAPTCHA, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no security.txt file is found, which limits transparency and readiness for vulnerability disclosures. The use of Drupal 7, an older CMS version, may pose risks if not regularly updated. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small agency but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and ensuring CMS and library updates.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update Drupal core and all third-party modules to mitigate known vulnerabilities, considering upgrading to a supported CMS version.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust with security researchers.
  5. Review and audit all third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize unnecessary data collection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Studio gazoline
Description
Studio Gazoline is a communication agency based in Montpellier, France, with over 20 years of experience specializing in digital communication, website creation, SEO, webmarketing, and graphic communication services.
Key services
Communication strategy and consulting, SEO (Search Engine Optimization), Website creation (Wordpress, Drupal, Prestashop, Symfony, AngularJS), Webmarketing and digital marketing, Graphic design and visual communication, Video creation, Community management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.5, Accordion-js, Drupal 7, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Drupal 7
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  4. Strong presence of tracking and marketing tools.
  5. Good GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and address.
  8. Website uses Drupal 7 CMS with several modern JS libraries.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 CMS, utilizing a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.5, and Accordion-js for UI components. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and icons from Font Awesome. Performance is moderate with a rich content structure and responsive design optimized for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. There is no evidence of advanced hosting provider details or CDN usage beyond common external libraries. The technical stack is mature but could benefit from modernization, especially upgrading Drupal and optimizing script loading for performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with studiogazoline.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review studiogazoline.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.