Skip to main content

Security report for studio.site

Other · N/A

Partial score · DNS & email only

74/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website studio.site currently serves a 'Page not found' error page with minimal content and no visible business or contact information. The site is built using the Nuxt framework and leverages Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling. Hosting appears to be on Google Cloud infrastructure. The technical infrastructure is modern but the site lacks substantive content and business details, indicating it may be inactive or under development. Security posture is weak due to an expired SSL certificate, absence of TLS protocols, and missing security headers beyond a basic Content-Security-Policy. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is available. Overall, the site exhibits low trustworthiness and poor user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Invalid SSL Certificate

      SSL certificate is expired or not yet valid

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate immediately

      • ASVS V12.2.2
      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching studio.site

This scan found 8 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
35
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention studio.site, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for studio.site.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of business-related content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There is no indication of company name, services, market position, or target audience. The domain is registered and linked to the studio.design ecosystem, suggesting a possible relation to a design or creative platform, but no explicit business model or partnerships are disclosed.

Security posture

The security maturity of the site is low. The expired SSL certificate and lack of TLS support expose users to potential risks. The strict SPF record indicates no email sending is authorized from this domain, reducing spam risks. The Content-Security-Policy restricts framing to trusted domains, which is a positive control. However, the absence of HSTS, DNSSEC, and other security headers, combined with no published security or incident response policies, highlights significant compliance and operational gaps.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and properly configure SSL certificates with support for TLS 1.2 or 1.3 to secure communications.
  2. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS usage.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Establish and disclose security policies including vulnerability disclosure and incident response procedures.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses the Nuxt.js framework, a modern Vue.js-based SSR framework, with Google Fonts and Font Awesome for UI elements. Hosting is on Google Cloud infrastructure, inferred from IP and storage URLs. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, but content is minimal due to the 404 error page. Mobile optimization is good given responsive meta tags and font loading strategies. SEO and accessibility are basic, with minimal metadata and no structured data or forms. The expired SSL and lack of TLS protocols represent critical technical debt and security risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with studio.site. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review studio.site.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.