Skip to main content

Security report for strict.nl

Strict b.v. · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Strict b.v. is a Dutch technology consulting firm specializing in enabling digital innovation, business continuity, and security for organizations. The company offers a broad range of services including digital transformation strategy, enterprise agility, privacy and security consulting, cloud solutions, and AI implementation. Positioned as a trusted partner, Strict serves sectors such as healthcare, government, transportation, and industry, emphasizing societal impact and sustainable digital progress. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on HubSpot CMS, integrating modern marketing and analytics tools with GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. Overall, Strict demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and digital maturity, making it a credible and reliable partner in its market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching strict.nl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention strict.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
20
Employees
0
Customers
19
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
10%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for strict.nl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets medium-sized organizations seeking to realize digital ambitions through consulting and implementation services. Its market positioning leverages expertise in mission-critical infrastructures and emerging technologies like AI. The business model focuses on advisory and hands-on support, with a strong emphasis on compliance and security. The presence of client testimonials and certifications enhances credibility. The company maintains active social media channels and uses HubSpot for marketing automation, indicating a strategic approach to customer engagement and lead generation. No suspicious or inconsistent WHOIS data was found, supporting legitimacy. The company appears well-integrated in its sector with partnerships and a clear value proposition.

Security posture

Strict b.v. maintains a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented. The website uses cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements and employs Google Consent Mode to manage user privacy preferences. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response plan reduces transparency in security governance. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security practices observed are good but could benefit from more explicit documentation and communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Add contact details for incident response or security-related inquiries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Strict b.v.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Strict b.v.
Description
Strict helpt organisaties hun digitale ambities waar te maken. Van onafhankelijk advies tot en met de resultaatgerichte begeleiding bij de implementatie van innovatieve technologie.
Key services
Strategie & Digitale Transformatie, Business Continuïteit, Enterprise Agility, Technologie & Innovatie, Privacy & Security, Cloud, Mission Critical Infrastructuren, Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, jQuery 1.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Consent Mode, Slick Carousel, Splide Carousel
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Consent Mode for privacy compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, HubSpot Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to digital innovation and business continuity
  3. Multiple contact methods provided including phone, email, and contact form
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented with GDPR compliance
  5. Use of HubSpot CMS and marketing tools indicates mature digital marketing practices
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference detected
  7. Strong trust indicators including client testimonials and certifications
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, leveraging jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries for UI components like carousels and modals. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with video content and multiple external scripts potentially impacting load times. Accessibility is basic but functional. The technical infrastructure is stable and suitable for a professional consulting firm, with opportunities for optimization in performance and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with strict.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review strict.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.