Skip to main content

Security report for strata.earth

N/A · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website strata.earth is currently a parked domain with no active business content or services presented. The site primarily serves advertising placeholders powered by Google Adsense and related ad networks. There is no visible company information, contact details, or business description, indicating the domain is not actively used for a commercial or organizational purpose. The domain was registered in 2016 and is privacy protected, which is common for parked domains but reduces transparency and trust. From a technical perspective, the site uses basic HTML and JavaScript with advertising scripts and Cloudfront CDN resources. There is no detected CMS or advanced framework. The site lacks SEO optimization, accessibility features, and mobile responsiveness is basic. Security posture is weak with no DNSSEC, no security headers, and no visible HTTPS enforcement mechanisms in the content. Privacy compliance is minimal with only a basic privacy policy accessible via a popup link and no cookie consent mechanism. Security risks include the absence of security headers and DNSSEC, which could expose users to certain attacks. The lack of contact or incident response information and no vulnerability disclosure policy further reduce the security maturity. The site does not collect user data via forms but does include tracking scripts and pixels from advertising networks, implying moderate user tracking without clear consent. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, business credibility, and privacy compliance, reflecting its status as a parked domain rather than an active business website. Strategic recommendations include establishing clear business content and contact information, improving security headers and DNSSEC, implementing GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies, and enhancing technical and design quality to build trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching strata.earth

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

There is no substantive business information or intelligence available from the website content. The domain appears to be parked and monetized through advertising networks rather than representing an active business entity. No market positioning, competitive advantages, or revenue streams can be identified. The lack of contact details and business description suggests no direct customer engagement or service offering. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS and absence of branding or subsidiaries further indicate minimal operational presence.

Security posture

The security posture of strata.earth is weak. The domain lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and visible HTTPS enforcement in the content. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The site uses third-party advertising scripts which introduce tracking but no explicit user consent mechanisms are present. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. These factors indicate low security maturity and potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. The absence of contact channels for security incidents further reduces readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and redirect all HTTP traffic.
  4. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  5. Provide contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
N/A
Description
No business description or content about the business is present. The site appears to be a parked domain or placeholder with advertising content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, Google Adsense Domains CAF, Google Ads, Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense Domains CAF, Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Google Ads tracking, Youseasky tracking
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Youseasky
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain with advertising placeholders.
  2. No business content or contact information is provided.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected.
  4. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  5. WHOIS data is privacy protected and does not reveal registrant details.
  6. No social media or external business links found.
  7. Advertising scripts dominate the page content.
  8. No forms or data collection fields present.
  9. No SEO or accessibility best practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and JavaScript, primarily serving advertising content from Google Adsense and related networks. No CMS or modern web frameworks are detected. Hosting appears to be via EuroDNS with Cloudfront CDN for assets. Performance is moderate but limited by advertising scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced SEO features. The site lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Technical debt is low due to minimal content but modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS, improving SEO, and enhancing accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with strata.earth. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review strata.earth.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.