Skip to main content

Security report for strap-bjj.com

STRAP BJJ · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Strap BJJ is a small business focused on providing a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu mobile application available on both iOS and Android platforms. The website serves primarily as a landing page to promote app downloads and partnership opportunities. The business targets BJJ practitioners and enthusiasts, positioning itself in a niche sports app market. The website content is minimal but functional, with basic branding and contact information limited to an email address. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, indicating a contemporary development approach. The site is mobile-optimized and loads with moderate performance, though SEO and accessibility features are basic. There is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. The absence of security headers and lack of HTTPS configuration details suggest room for improvement in security hardening. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security policies, incident response information, and cookie consent mechanisms. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing immediate data exposure risks. Overall, the security posture is basic with recommendations to implement HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures. The overall risk is moderate due to the lack of domain registration transparency and minimal security controls. Strategic improvements in domain registration verification, security best practices, and privacy compliance would enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching strap-bjj.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Strap BJJ operates in the niche market of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu sports applications, leveraging mobile platforms to reach its audience. The business model centers on app distribution and partnerships, with no evident e-commerce or subscription services on the website. The company appears small with limited public business information and no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The presence of official app store links adds credibility, but the lack of WHOIS data and minimal contact details limit business transparency. Growth potential depends on app adoption and partnership expansion. The partnership image suggests some collaboration efforts, but no partner domains are listed. The company could benefit from enhanced digital presence and clearer business disclosures.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic and lacks several critical elements. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers reduces protection against common web threats. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating low maturity in security governance. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent or GDPR indicators. The site does not collect user data via forms, which limits attack surface but also reduces engagement capabilities. Overall, the security maturity is low, and improvements are necessary to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish and link to comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Obtain and maintain accurate WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy.
  5. Develop and publish security and incident response policies to enhance trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
STRAP BJJ
Description
Strap BJJ appears to be a business related to Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, offering a mobile app available on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. The website promotes the app and partnership opportunities.
Key services
Mobile app for BJJ practitioners, Partnership opportunities
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, JavaScript, CSS, WOFF2 fonts
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple landing page promoting a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu app.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  3. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  4. No cookie or tracking policies detected.
  5. Contact information limited to a single email address.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. Minimal SEO and accessibility features.
  9. No forms or data collection fields present on the page.
  10. No evidence of advertising or analytics services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Next.js) with React, indicating a contemporary technical stack suitable for scalable web applications. The site uses optimized assets such as WOFF2 fonts and preloads critical resources for performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. However, SEO metadata is minimal, and accessibility features are basic. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading. Technical debt appears low but security and compliance technical implementations are lacking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with strap-bjj.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review strap-bjj.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.