Skip to main content

Security report for strangeclocks.com

Leven Labs, Inc. · Other · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain strangeclocks.com is currently serving a 404 Not Found error page with minimal content describing its use by Admiral, a service provider for digital copyright access control and privacy compliance. The domain is registered to Leven Labs, Inc., a US-based company, with a registration date in 2022, consistent with a relatively new service provider. The website lacks active business content, contact information, or user-facing services, limiting its utility and trustworthiness from a visitor perspective. Technically, the site is hosted on Google Cloud Platform with AWS DNS servers, uses standard web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript), and enforces encryption with frequent certificate rotation. However, no security headers or advanced SEO and accessibility features are detected. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with no third-party cookies and GDPR consent mechanisms mentioned. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content but scores low on content quality and business credibility due to its error state and lack of information.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching strangeclocks.com

This scan found 12 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
78
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leven Labs, Inc. appears to operate in the niche market of digital copyright access control and privacy compliance services, leveraging Admiral's platform. The business model focuses on providing tools for digital publishers to manage copyright access, privacy consent, subscriptions, and donations. The target audience includes digital publishers and their visitors. The company is small, with no subsidiaries or partner domains identified. The domain registration and hosting infrastructure are consistent with a legitimate small technology service provider. However, the lack of an active website or marketing presence limits visibility and market positioning. There are no indications of revenue streams or growth signals from the current domain content.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with industry-standard encryption and frequent certificate rotation. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain security. No DNSSEC is enabled, which is a minor gap. The site hosts only static content (JavaScript, HTML, CSS) with no executable files or downloads, reducing attack surface. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is published. Incident response contact is provided via an email address for security issues. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the domain's current use but could be improved with enhanced headers, DNSSEC, and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Develop and publish clear contact information and business content to improve credibility and user trust.
  5. Enhance website content beyond the 404 error page to provide meaningful information or redirect to active services.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Leven Labs, Inc.
Description
This domain is used by Admiral (getadmiral.com) to provide copyright access control services for digital publishers, including privacy consent management and subscription/donation support.
Key services
copyright access control, privacy consent management, subscription and donation support
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, AWS DNS
Platforms
Google Cloud Platform (GCE Europe West1)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Encryption required
  • Frequent certificate rotation
  • No executable files hosted
  • Continuous scanning and auditing

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is currently a 404 Not Found error page.
  2. Content is minimal and informational about the domain's use by Admiral service.
  3. No active business website content or user-facing services detected.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the page.
  5. No forms or interactive elements detected except for checkbox toggles for content display.
  6. No social media links or structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) present.
  7. No security headers visible in provided data.
  8. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a valid registration period.
  9. No tracking or advertising scripts detected.
  10. No analytics or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Google Cloud Platform with AWS DNS servers, indicating a hybrid cloud infrastructure. The technology stack is basic, consisting of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without detectable CMS or frameworks. Performance is moderate, but the site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is poor due to missing meta tags and structured data. The site currently serves a 404 error page, indicating no active content or service. There is no evidence of analytics, marketing tools, or advertising networks. The technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist to improve user experience, accessibility, and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with strangeclocks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review strangeclocks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.