Stova · Technology · United States
Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.
Stova is a technology company specializing in event management software designed to streamline planning and execution of virtual, in-person, and hybrid events. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of services including registration, onsite check-in, event marketing, attendee engagement, and analytics. Positioned as a modern SaaS solution, Stova targets event planners and corporate marketing teams seeking flexible and scalable event management tools. The company appears to be relatively new, founded in 2022, with a medium-sized operational footprint and a US-based presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS with integrations of HubSpot for marketing automation, Google Analytics for visitor tracking, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good SEO practices, mobile optimization, and uses modern web technologies such as jQuery and Beaver Builder. Hosting is likely on AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS records. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs domain locking via EPP status flags, and uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, reflecting GDPR compliance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security policy or incident response information is published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, Stova presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with strong business credibility and privacy compliance. The absence of terms of service and security policy pages are minor gaps. The domain registration uses privacy protection appropriately, and no WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with content access. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and incident response policies, and enhancing accessibility to further strengthen the website's security posture and user trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google Ads
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention stova.io, from OffSeq Breach.
1 subdomain affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for stova.io.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with stova.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stova.io.