Skip to main content

Security report for storifyme.com

StorifyMe GmbH · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

StorifyMe GmbH operates a technology platform specializing in mobile-native storytelling formats such as Stories, Shorts, Snaps, and Ads, designed to enhance user engagement and monetization for apps and websites. The company targets a broad range of clients from startups to large enterprises, positioning itself as a leader in visual content creation and distribution. The website demonstrates strong branding, client trust signals, and a comprehensive suite of services aimed at digital marketing and content innovation. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, GSAP animations, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and HubSpot, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, but the overall professional presentation and client endorsements support a trustworthy business profile. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency, publishing incident response contacts, and improving direct contact availability to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching storifyme.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention storifyme.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
79
Employees
0
Customers
79
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for storifyme.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

StorifyMe is well positioned in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS solutions for mobile-native content creation and distribution. Its competitive advantage lies in rapid integration (within 15 minutes), no-code experience, and a diverse product portfolio addressing storytelling, short videos, ads, and user-generated content. The company serves multiple verticals including e-commerce, publishing, marketing, finance, telecommunications, airlines, real estate, and beauty. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and advertising monetization. The presence of reputable clients such as Ryanair and Karaca indicates strong market acceptance and growth potential. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses advanced marketing tools to support customer acquisition and retention. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and direct contact details may limit some trust aspects for new prospects.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent banners aligned with GDPR requirements, reflecting a good baseline for privacy compliance. Multiple tracking and analytics scripts are used, but no sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and a published security policy or incident response contact reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The site uses reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited for security. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact information for security issues.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for sales and support to improve transparency and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
StorifyMe GmbH
Description
StorifyMe makes it radically easily to create, publish, and measure the impact of your visual (web) and AMP stories. The platform offers mobile-native Stories, Shorts, Snaps, and Ads that integrate easily with no-code experience into any mobile app and website.
Key services
StorifyMe Stories, StorifyMe Shorts, StorifyMe Ads, StorifyMe Snaps, StorifyMe Assistant
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, JavaScript, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), jQuery, Finsweet Attributes, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, FirstPromoter
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern security and analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and consistent design
  3. Multiple client testimonials and logos from reputable companies
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact form
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or new registration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including GSAP for animations and jQuery for UI interactions. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and HubSpot, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and fast loading times, supported by CDN usage. The technical implementation is robust with good SEO and accessibility practices. However, the lack of explicit security headers and WHOIS data gaps represent areas for technical improvement. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare or similar CDN providers, enhancing performance and security. Overall, the technical stack supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with storifyme.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review storifyme.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.