Skip to main content

Security report for storeapps.org

Store Apps Technologies LLP · E-commerce · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

StoreApps Technologies LLP is a mature and reputable provider of WooCommerce plugins designed to enhance e-commerce store performance through marketing, inventory management, and checkout optimization tools. With over 14 years of domain presence and official recognition as a WooCommerce extension developer, the company serves a broad audience of WooCommerce store owners and online retailers. Their product portfolio includes popular plugins such as Smart Coupons, Smart Manager, and Smart Offers, supporting a business model based on software sales and subscriptions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and WooCommerce platforms, leveraging common web technologies and third-party analytics and marketing tools. While the site is well-designed and content-rich, performance is somewhat slow, and accessibility is basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and strong cipher suites but lacks advanced SSL features like HSTS and OCSP stapling, and security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but no visible cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site demonstrates high business credibility and trustworthiness but could improve technical and security aspects to enhance user trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching storeapps.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

StoreApps holds a strong market position as an official WooCommerce extension developer with a large user base exceeding 300,000 customers. Their competitive advantage lies in delivering enterprise-quality plugins that address key e-commerce challenges such as coupon management, affiliate marketing, upselling, and checkout optimization. The company targets WooCommerce store owners seeking to increase sales and operational efficiency. Revenue streams are primarily from plugin sales and subscription licenses. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem including WooCommerce and related product offerings like Offermative, Putler, and Icegram, indicating a diversified product portfolio. Growth indicators include active community engagement, frequent updates, and positive customer testimonials. Strategic observations suggest continued focus on product innovation and enhanced security and privacy compliance to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is enforced with TLS 1.2 and strong cipher suites, mitigating common transport layer risks. However, the absence of HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption reduces resilience against certain attacks and impacts performance. Lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential clickjacking and content injection risks. No evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies was found, indicating gaps in security governance. Privacy compliance is supported by a detailed privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling and enable TLS session resumption to improve SSL performance and reliability.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  5. Develop and publish a formal vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response plan to improve security governance and customer trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress and WooCommerce stack, utilizing popular plugins and SEO tools like Rank Math. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google reCAPTCHA for analytics, marketing, and security. Hosting is provided by Hetzner, indicated by the IP address. Performance is suboptimal with a page load time exceeding 13 seconds and a large page size (~2MB), suggesting opportunities for optimization such as resource minification and caching improvements. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with storeapps.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review storeapps.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.