Skip to main content

Security report for storagesystems.ie

Storage Systems Ltd · Manufacturing · Ireland

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Storage Systems Ltd is a leading supplier of warehouse and commercial storage solutions in Ireland, offering a wide range of products including racking, shelving, mezzanine floors, and automated storage solutions. The company targets businesses and organizations requiring efficient storage systems, positioning itself as Ireland's top racking and shelving units supplier. The website demonstrates a solid technical infrastructure built on WordPress with modern SEO and accessibility practices, including structured data and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, cookie consent management, and no visible vulnerabilities. Overall, the site reflects a professional and trustworthy business presence with comprehensive contact information and social media engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching storagesystems.ie

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on B2B sales of storage solutions. Its market position is strong within Ireland, supported by a partner domain for the UK market. The business model centers on supplying and fitting storage systems, with services extending to inspections and automated solutions. The website content and structure support clear navigation and user engagement, indicating a mature digital presence. The company maintains multiple regional offices with dedicated contact points, enhancing customer reach and service quality.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and integrates a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. While explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, the site avoids exposing sensitive data and uses reputable third-party scripts responsibly. No incident response or security policy pages were found, suggesting an area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and documented security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance data protection officer contact visibility if applicable to improve GDPR compliance.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Storage Systems Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Storage Systems Ltd
Description
Storage Systems Ltd - The best storage solutions for shelving & racking at affordable prices. Contact us now!
Key services
Warehouse Solutions, Commercial Fit-Outs, Racking Inspections, Automated Storage Solutions, Mobile Shelving, Steel Shelving, Mezzanine Floors, Storage Lockers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Vimeo Embedded Video, CookiePro Consent Management, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Google Tag Manager with consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookiePro Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent banner implemented with OneTrust
  3. Multiple contact points with verified company emails and phone numbers
  4. Social media presence on major platforms
  5. Structured data implemented for SEO
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO plugin, leveraging jQuery and embedded Vimeo videos for rich media content. CookiePro manages consent, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading and responsive design. Technical debt appears low, but adding modern security headers and optimizing third-party dependencies could further improve robustness and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with storagesystems.ie. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review storagesystems.ie.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.