Skip to main content

Security report for stodola.agency

Stodola Agency · Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stodola Agency is a small marketing support and content production company based in Slovakia, serving B2B and SME clients internationally. Their services include graphic design, copywriting, social media posting, photo and video production, presentations, and website creation and management. The company emphasizes reliability, quality, quick delivery, and clear communication without retainers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and jQuery, with a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and good SSL configuration, but lacks security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though privacy compliance and security practices could be improved.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stodola.agency

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates in the marketing services sector targeting B2B and SME clients, positioning itself as a reliable, no-nonsense partner focused on delivering quality content and marketing assets remotely from Slovakia. Their business model is service-based with no retainers, relying on clear briefs and quick turnaround. The website content and contact details support a legitimate and professional operation. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for compliance improvement. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused niche and a clear value proposition.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts that might expose user data. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers and formalizing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add incident response contact information or abuse/security email addresses to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident handling.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to reduce vulnerability risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stodola Agency
Description
Marketing support and content production agency based in Slovakia serving B2B and SME clients internationally. Focus on reliable, quality, quick delivery without retainers.
Key services
Graphic Design, Copywriting, Social Media Posting, Photo & Video, Presentations, Website Creation & Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Elementor
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request and privacy protections.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information includes a company domain email and Slovak phone number.
  5. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and jQuery libraries.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled with good SSL configuration.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Content is professional and relevant to marketing support services.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. No incident response or security policy information provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform (WordPress) with Elementor page builder and jQuery libraries, indicating a standard and widely supported technology stack. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices. The HTML and CSS appear valid and well-structured. However, the absence of security headers and privacy-related pages indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. No advanced analytics or tracking technologies are detected, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small agency but could benefit from security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stodola.agency. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stodola.agency.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.