Skip to main content

Security report for stitina.cz

Obec Štítina · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.stitina.cz serves as the official online presence for the municipality of Štítina in the Czech Republic. It provides residents and visitors with local news, official municipal notices, event calendars, and contact information for municipal offices. The site targets local citizens and stakeholders interested in community affairs and municipal services. The business model is that of a government service portal, focusing on transparency and community engagement. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper.js, and Mmenu.js, likely built on the Ocelot CMS platform. The site is mobile optimized, accessible, and performs moderately well. It uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, though it lacks some advanced security headers. Cookie consent is implemented, but a formal privacy policy page is missing. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which is unusual for a government domain and slightly reduces trust, though the site content and contact details appear legitimate. Overall, the website is a trustworthy and professional municipal portal with good content quality and technical implementation. Strategic recommendations include publishing a privacy policy, adding security headers, and providing vulnerability disclosure information to enhance compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stitina.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Štítina's municipal website positions itself as a local government information hub, serving a small community of approximately 1,270 residents. The site offers transparency through official notices, event calendars, and contact details for municipal officials. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service and community engagement. The lack of commercial advertising or tracking indicates a focus on user privacy and minimal data collection. The partnership with Galileo Corporation for hosting or development suggests a collaboration with a local IT service provider. Growth indicators are limited due to the nature of the entity, but the site maintains consistent updates and community interaction. The absence of social media links suggests a traditional communication approach primarily via the website and local channels.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism aligns with privacy best practices. However, the site lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no visible security.txt or incident response contact information, which limits the ability to report vulnerabilities. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain transparency but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the site is secure for typical municipal use but could benefit from enhanced security controls and formalized incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Obec Štítina
Description
Official website of the municipality of Štítina providing local news, official notices, contact information, event calendar, and community services.
Key services
Local news and updates, Official municipal notices, Event calendar, Contact information for municipal offices, Public forms and documents
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper.js, Mmenu.js, Highslide JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official municipal site for Štítina, Czech Republic.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well-structured with local news, events, and official notices.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with official emails and phone numbers.
  4. No privacy policy page found, but cookie consent is implemented.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for a government domain.
  8. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and is mobile optimized.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Accessibility certification link is present, indicating attention to accessibility standards.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper.js for sliders, and Mmenu.js for navigation menus, indicating a modern but somewhat traditional front-end stack. The CMS appears to be Ocelot, a platform commonly used for municipal websites in the Czech Republic. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs such as cdnjs.cloudflare.com and stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features, including an accessibility certification link. The site uses SVG icons for weather and UI elements, enhancing visual quality. There is no evidence of heavy analytics or tracking scripts, which benefits privacy and performance. The absence of advanced frameworks or SPA technologies suggests a straightforward, server-rendered site architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stitina.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stitina.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.