Skip to main content

Security report for stirnubuks.lv

Stirnu Buks · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stirnubuks.lv is a professionally maintained website dedicated to organizing and promoting trail running events primarily in Latvia. It serves a community of trail runners by providing detailed information on upcoming races, past event results, participant statistics, and related news. The platform leverages modern web technologies including WordPress CMS, Firebase for authentication and data management, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing pixels such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and TikTok Pixel. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR standards. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and Firebase authentication, but lacks explicit security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the site shows no suspicious indicators and appears legitimate. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital maturity with room for improvement in security best practices and transparency of contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stirnubuks.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche of sports event organization, specifically trail running, targeting active individuals and sports enthusiasts in Latvia and neighboring regions. It maintains a strong community presence with thousands of participants in events and active social media channels. The business model revolves around event management, participant registration, and community engagement. The website's content and structure suggest a medium-sized organization with consistent branding and good market positioning within its sector. The use of Firebase and modern analytics tools indicates a focus on digital engagement and data-driven marketing. However, the absence of explicit business contact details and WHOIS transparency limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and Firebase authentication implemented for user management. It includes cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and security.txt reduces its security maturity. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from enhanced security policies, incident response contact information, and regular security audits of third-party scripts and Firebase rules. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and Firebase security rules to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata for improved user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stirnu Buks
Description
Stirnubuks.lv is a website dedicated to organizing and providing information about trail running events (taku skrējiens) in Latvia and nearby regions. It offers details about upcoming races, previous events, participant statistics, and news related to the trail running series.
Key services
Trail running event organization, Participant registration and management, Event information dissemination, Results publication, Community news and updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Firebase (auth, firestore, analytics), jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Tailwind CSS (commented but CSS classes used), JavaScript ES Modules
Frameworks
WordPress theme framework, Firebase SDK
Platforms
WordPress, Firebase
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Firebase authentication
  • Cookie consent script included
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Firebase Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
Firebase Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about trail running events.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Uses modern analytics and marketing pixels with consent mechanism.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main pages.
  5. No explicit security.txt or incident response info found.
  6. Privacy policy and cookie consent are implemented and accessible.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Firebase authentication is used for user login and token management.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a custom theme and integrates Firebase services for authentication and data storage. It uses modern JavaScript modules and includes multiple analytics and marketing pixels for user tracking and engagement. The site is mobile responsive and uses Tailwind CSS classes for styling, although the Tailwind CDN script is commented out, indicating possible local CSS usage. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The absence of explicit hosting provider information limits infrastructure analysis. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and functional but could benefit from improved security headers and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stirnubuks.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stirnubuks.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.