Skip to main content

Security report for stiftung-begabtenfoerderung-agrar.de

Stiftung für Begabtenförderung der Deutschen Landwirtschaft · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Stiftung für Begabtenförderung der Deutschen Landwirtschaft is a German non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting talented individuals in the agricultural sector through funding and scholarships for professional development courses, seminars, and internships. The website clearly targets individuals working in or connected to agriculture who seek educational advancement. The foundation positions itself as a niche player focused on agricultural education and talent promotion within Germany. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with common plugins such as Complianz for GDPR cookie consent and Matomo for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies or incident response information. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, though it could improve transparency around privacy policies and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stiftung-begabtenfoerderung-agrar.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention stiftung-begabtenfoerderung-agrar.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for stiftung-begabtenfoerderung-agrar.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the agricultural education sector, providing funding for recognized professional development programs. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on educational grants and scholarships. The target audience includes agricultural professionals and students in Germany. The website links to partner educational institutions, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The foundation's market position is specialized and focused, with no indication of commercial activities or revenue streams beyond educational funding. The content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a credible image. Growth indicators or parent/subsidiary relationships are not evident from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting compliance with basic security and privacy standards. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are important for transparency and trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement additional headers and publish security-related documentation to improve posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response information on the website to enhance transparency.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance privacy policy visibility and detail to improve GDPR compliance.
  5. Consider adding explicit contact information such as official emails and phone numbers for better business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stiftung für Begabtenförderung der Deutschen Landwirtschaft
Description
Die Stiftung fördert die Teilnahme an berufsbezogenen Maßnahmen zur Weiterbildung, z.B. Lehrgänge, Seminare, Praktika im In- und Ausland sowie innovative Projekte mit Bildungsbezug.
Key services
Förderung von Weiterbildungsmaßnahmen, Stipendien für Lehrgänge, Seminare, Praktika, Innovative Bildungsprojekte
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Divi Theme, jQuery, Caldera Forms, Complianz GDPR plugin, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and focused on agricultural education funding.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with Complianz plugin.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in the HTML.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and standard plugins.
  7. No security.txt or incident response info published.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  9. External links mainly to partner educational institutions and cookie database.
  10. No advertising networks detected; only Matomo analytics used.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a widely used CMS (WordPress) with the Divi theme, indicating a standard and maintainable infrastructure. It uses modern web technologies including jQuery and integrates Matomo for analytics, which respects privacy better than some alternatives. The Complianz GDPR plugin manages cookie consent effectively. Hosting appears to be via DomainControl.com, likely GoDaddy. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is present but could be enhanced with more meta tags and structured data. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stiftung-begabtenfoerderung-agrar.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stiftung-begabtenfoerderung-agrar.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.