The website stiftung-ap3.li appears to represent a small foundation or organization based in Liechtenstein, as indicated by the domain and language. The site is built on WordPress using the Brizy page builder, with minimal content and no visible business descriptions, contact information, or legal policies. Technically, the site uses standard WordPress technologies but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The security posture is basic, with no detected vulnerabilities but also no strong security practices. Overall, the site presents low business credibility due to the absence of contact and policy information. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, contact details, and implementing security best practices to improve trust and compliance.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention stiftung-ap3.li, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for stiftung-ap3.li right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The business behind stiftung-ap3.li is not clearly described on the website. The domain is registered in Liechtenstein with consistent WHOIS data, suggesting legitimacy. The lack of detailed business information, contact channels, or certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or business model. The site likely targets a local or niche audience but does not provide clear services or offerings. There are no visible partnerships or related domains. The foundation may be in early stages or maintain a low digital footprint.
Security posture
Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that enhance protection. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. There are no visible forms collecting sensitive data, reducing immediate risk, but the absence of security best practices and policies is a concern. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies.
Recommendations
Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible.
Add a cookie policy with a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
Publish clear contact information including email and phone for business and security incidents.
Configure and enforce security headers to improve site security posture.
Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Brizy Builder, jQuery, wp-emoji
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP, MySQL
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
30/100
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website is built on WordPress with Brizy page builder.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected.
No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
Content is minimal and mostly structural with no substantive business or legal information.
No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
No advertising or marketing tools detected.
WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the website's apparent origin.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress with the Brizy page builder plugin, using standard web technologies including jQuery and wp-emoji scripts. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and WordPress core domains. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile responsiveness appears good due to modern CSS usage. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags found. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site does not use analytics or tracking services, indicating minimal data collection.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with stiftung-ap3.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stiftung-ap3.li.