Skip to main content

Security report for stensan.com

PakMarkas, SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stensan, operated by PakMarkas, SIA, is a well-established label manufacturing company based in Latvia, specializing in custom blank and colorful labels tailored to diverse business needs. With a market presence since 1995 and a leadership position in the Baltic States, the company offers high-quality, durable, and sustainable label solutions supported by certifications such as FSC and ISO 9001. Their website provides a professional and user-friendly experience with detailed product information, client references, and easy contact options. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and CSRF tokens implemented, though improvements are recommended in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy, but overall business credibility remains high based on website content and trust signals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stensan.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention stensan.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for stensan.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stensan operates in the manufacturing sector focusing on label production and sales, targeting businesses requiring custom labeling solutions such as logistics, retail, and manufacturing. Their competitive advantages include a broad product range, fast delivery within 48 hours, and a dedicated sales team. The business model revolves around direct sales supported by an online configurator and content-rich website. The company maintains strong partnerships and client relationships evidenced by logos of reputable companies. Growth indicators include a long market presence and certifications that enhance trust. The company’s operations are centralized in Latvia with no detected subsidiaries or parent companies. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance digital trust by improving transparency in domain registration and security disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection evident. However, the lack of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism despite active tracking pixels is a compliance risk under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, indicating an area for improvement in security culture and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Investigate and clarify domain WHOIS registration details to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PakMarkas, SIA
Registration number
40003269498
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PakMarkas, SIA
Description
Stensan is a leading label manufacturer specializing in custom premium blank labels tailored to business needs, offering high-quality, durable, and sustainable label solutions with fast delivery and dedicated sales support.
Key services
Custom blank label production, Colorful label printing, Fast delivery within 48 hours, Dedicated sales support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear business focus.
  3. Strong presence of trust indicators including certifications and client logos.
  4. No security headers detected in HTML source; opportunity for improvement.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found despite tracking scripts present.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS with jQuery 3.5.1 and integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting SEO best practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the business needs, though there is room for improvement in security header implementation and cookie consent management to reduce compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stensan.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stensan.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.