Skip to main content

Security report for steelstockdirect.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website steelstockdirect.co.uk is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare security verification challenge page, which blocks direct access to any business or content information. The WHOIS data provided is suspicious, showing a domain creation date in the future (December 19, 2025), which undermines the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the domain. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visible, nor are there any contact details or business descriptions available. The technical infrastructure relies on Cloudflare's security services, but no further technology stack or CMS information is discernible due to the blocked content. Security posture is limited to the presence of Cloudflare's challenge and a Content-Security-Policy header, but no deeper analysis is possible. Overall, the website's risk profile is high due to lack of accessible information and suspicious domain registration data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching steelstockdirect.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention steelstockdirect.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for steelstockdirect.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the Cloudflare WAF challenge, no business intelligence data such as company name, market position, services, or sector information could be extracted. The domain's WHOIS data does not provide registrant details or organizational information, and no social media or partner links are present. This lack of transparency and data limits any meaningful business intelligence analysis.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's security challenge mechanism, indicating an intent to protect against malicious bots and attacks. A Content-Security-Policy header is present, which is a positive security practice. However, the inability to access the actual website content prevents assessment of other security controls such as secure forms, vulnerability disclosures, or incident response contacts. The suspicious WHOIS data further raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential security risks.

Recommendations

  1. Ensure the domain WHOIS data is accurate and consistent with business registration details to improve trustworthiness.
  2. Make website content accessible beyond the Cloudflare security challenge for legitimate users to enable proper analysis and user engagement.
  3. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with legal and regulatory requirements.
  4. Provide visible contact information and security incident response contacts to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly review and update security headers and SSL configurations to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website is currently presenting a Cloudflare security verification challenge page blocking direct content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare Challenge Platform
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Cloudflare security challenge
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare security challenge.
  2. No visible business or contact information on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or data collection elements detected.
  5. No social media or external business links found except Cloudflare references.
  6. WHOIS data is inconsistent and suspicious with future creation date.
  7. Security headers present but limited information due to blocked content.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond Cloudflare challenge.
  9. Content safety is rated safe as no adult or explicit content is present.
  10. Overall analysis is incomplete due to WAF blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, utilizing their security challenge platform and Turnstile CAPTCHA technology to mitigate bot traffic. No CMS or additional frameworks are detectable due to the blocked content. The HTML is minimal and primarily serves the security challenge interface. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed accurately. The presence of a strict Content-Security-Policy header is a positive technical control. However, the domain's WHOIS data is inconsistent, showing a future creation date, which is unusual and suggests possible data errors or domain registration issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with steelstockdirect.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review steelstockdirect.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.