Skip to main content

Security report for statuspal.io

StatusPal UG · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

StatusPal UG operates a SaaS platform providing hosted status pages and incident communication tools targeted at CTOs, DevOps, SREs, and support engineers. The company positions itself as a reliable and scalable solution for monitoring and communicating system status, with features including multi-language support, notifications, and powerful APIs. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management, and employs SVG graphics for visual appeal. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers and published security policies are absent. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for SaaS businesses, and no suspicious patterns are detected. The website demonstrates high trustworthiness and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching statuspal.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention statuspal.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
224
Employees
0
Customers
224
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
12%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for statuspal.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

StatusPal targets technology sector customers requiring incident communication and status monitoring solutions. Its business model is SaaS with a focus on ease of use, automation, and integration capabilities. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with tools like Calendly and maintains active social media channels on LinkedIn, Twitter, Medium, and GitHub. Customer testimonials and a blog indicate engagement and credibility. The absence of public WHOIS data is mitigated by consistent branding and clear contact email. The platform's extensibility via API and multi-language features suggest a growth-oriented approach. Market positioning is strong within the niche of status page providers, competing with other SaaS platforms.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, and no incident response contact channels are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is good but could be improved by adding formal security policies and headers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a SaaS platform but has room for enhancement to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Create and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve privacy compliance.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
StatusPal UG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
StatusPal UG
Description
Monitor and communicate the status of your site, app or API with your very own status page. Create it in less than a minute with StatusPal, try it free now!
Key services
Hosted status pages, Incident communication, Monitoring and automations, Notifications, Multi-language status pages, Powerful API
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS public data available, likely privacy protected
  3. Strong branding and consistent messaging
  4. Multiple customer testimonials and trust signals present
  5. Cookie consent implemented indicating privacy awareness
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  7. No phone numbers or physical contact forms found on main page
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, GitHub, Medium
  9. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  10. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack featuring Next.js and React, ensuring server-side rendering and good performance. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SVG graphics are used extensively for crisp visuals. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and images. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by adding security headers and formal policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100 −2Medium26 findingsView report
  2. 74/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with statuspal.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review statuspal.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.