Skip to main content

Security report for statoregioni.it

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

58/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website statoregioni.it is currently inaccessible, returning a 503 Service Unavailable error indicating no server is available to handle requests. Due to this, no meaningful content, metadata, or business information is available for analysis. The domain is long-registered since 2003, suggesting an established presence, but the lack of accessible content limits assessment of the business or its market position. Technically, the site lacks visible security headers, privacy policies, or contact information, and DNSSEC is not enabled, indicating a weak security posture. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include restoring website availability, implementing HTTPS and security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact and business information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching statoregioni.it

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
58

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence could be extracted due to the absence of accessible website content. The domain age suggests a potentially established entity, but no details on market positioning, services, or partnerships are available. No contact or legal information is present to validate business operations or credibility.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal with no evidence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or DNSSEC. The domain status is 'ok' but DNSSEC is not enabled. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found. The site is currently inaccessible, which may indicate server issues or maintenance rather than active security controls. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Restore website availability to provide access to content and services.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enable DNSSEC for domain security.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  5. Provide clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website returns a 503 Service Unavailable error with minimal HTML content indicating no server is available to handle the request. No specific WAF vendor identified but content is blocked/inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible, returning a 503 Service Unavailable error.
  2. No metadata, scripts, forms, or external links detected due to minimal content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or business details available on the site.
  5. WHOIS data shows a long-registered domain with no DNSSEC and no privacy protection.
  6. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS confirmation and missing security headers.
  7. Content safety is rated safe given the absence of content.
  8. AI scoring is heavily penalized due to inaccessible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal 503 error page with no metadata, scripts, or content. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers suggests outdated or minimal technical infrastructure. Performance and accessibility cannot be assessed due to unavailability. The domain is registered since 2003 but the hosting provider and platform details are unknown. Technical modernization and security hardening are recommended once the site is restored.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with statoregioni.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review statoregioni.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.