Skip to main content

Security report for statistikkonsulterna.se

Magnus Pettersson · Other · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Statistikkonsulterna Väst AB is a specialized consulting company based in Sweden, focusing on statistical methods, mathematics, and advanced programming. They provide expert statistical guidance and creative solutions primarily to researchers and developers, aiming to deliver high-quality decision support based on quantitative data. The company positions itself as a competence center in its niche market with a small but professional presence since 2017. The website reflects a well-structured and professionally designed digital presence using WordPress with SEO and translation capabilities, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks published security policies and advanced security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy but could improve transparency and compliance to enhance user trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching statistikkonsulterna.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention statistikkonsulterna.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for statistikkonsulterna.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche consulting sector, providing statistical and mathematical expertise combined with programming services. Their business model revolves around service delivery to academic and development clients, leveraging their expertise to support research and decision-making processes. The presence of a LinkedIn profile and structured data indicates an intent to maintain professional credibility and visibility. The lack of privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and governance. The company targets a Swedish audience but offers English language support via Weglot. The website content and structure support a clear value proposition but do not reveal revenue streams or partnerships explicitly.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses modern CMS technology with some security best practices, but lacks critical security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and others that could mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. Tracking is minimal and limited to Jetpack Stats, with no cookie consent mechanism, indicating GDPR compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding policies, headers, and compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Statistikkonsulterna Väst AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Magnus Pettersson
Description
Statistikkonsulterna Väst AB är ett kompetenscentrum inom statistik, matematik och avancerad programmering. De stödjer forskare och annan utveckling med statistisk vägledning samt kreativa lösningar och skapar beslutsmaterial med hög kvalitet baserade på kvantitativa data genom tillämpning och utveckling av statistiska metoder.
Key services
Statistical consulting, Mathematical expertise, Advanced programming, Statistical guidance, Decision support based on quantitative data
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, Weglot (translation plugin), Rank Math SEO, Jetpack Stats, Google Fonts (Inter, Cardo), SVG icons
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URLs use https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, Weglot translation
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address
  4. No security or incident response policies published
  5. Uses modern WordPress CMS with SEO and translation plugins
  6. Minimal tracking via Jetpack Stats
  7. Good content quality and professional design
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with plugins for SEO (Rank Math), translation (Weglot), and analytics (Jetpack Stats). It uses modern web fonts and SVG icons, indicating a contemporary front-end design. Hosting appears to be with One.com based on URL patterns. Performance is moderate with responsive design and accessibility features implemented. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No broken elements or errors were detected. The technical stack is standard for small professional consulting firms, with opportunities to enhance security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with statistikkonsulterna.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review statistikkonsulterna.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.