Skip to main content

Security report for stampa-group.com

STAMPA GROUP SE · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

STAMPA GROUP SE is a Czech holding company specializing in steel constructions and engineering manufacturing, with a history dating back to 1996. The company operates through multiple subsidiaries offering a wide range of industrial products and services including steel structures, welding, tanks, industrial automation, and plastics production. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting industrial clients and partners. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with the Enfold theme, using standard web technologies and is mobile optimized. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which impacts trust and compliance assessments. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook supports business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stampa-group.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention stampa-group.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for stampa-group.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid position in the manufacturing sector, particularly in steel and industrial engineering. Its business model as a holding company with multiple subsidiaries allows diversified service offerings and regional market penetration. The parent company is Industrial Multicraft Group, indicating integration into a larger industrial ecosystem. The website's detailed listing of subsidiaries and their profiles suggests a transparent and structured corporate group. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the website may limit immediate customer engagement but the social media channels provide alternative contact points. The company emphasizes quality, tradition, and comprehensive project delivery, targeting industrial and engineering sectors primarily in the Czech Republic and neighboring countries.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No signs of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as no visible incident response or security contact information, indicates gaps in compliance and security readiness. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish explicit contact information for security incidents and consider adding a security.txt file.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is complete and accurate.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
STAMPA GROUP SE
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
STAMPA GROUP SE
Description
STAMPA Group SE is a holding company focused on steel production with a tradition since 1996. They provide complete deliveries including project management, design and construction, production, surface treatment, and assembly. Their annual production capacity is 6000-7000 tons with over 200 employees and multiple subsidiary companies.
Key services
Technological steel structures, Welding and machine parts, Tanks, silos and containers, Industrial facilities, Air coolers and shutters, Floodlighting towers and traction columns, Production and storage halls, Design activity, Precise form tooling and production of single-purpose machines, Industrial automation and electric units
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.3, Enfold Theme 4.2, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Fonts (Open Sans), MediaElement.js, Magnific Popup
Frameworks
WordPress, Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is professional and focused on steel manufacturing and engineering services.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook is confirmed.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with Enfold theme and common JS libraries.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.3 using the Enfold theme and Avia Framework, which are mature and widely used technologies. It uses jQuery 1.12.4 and includes Google Fonts and media player libraries. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site structure and navigation are clear and consistent, supporting a good user experience. Technical risks include outdated WordPress version and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stampa-group.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stampa-group.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.