Skip to main content

Security report for stabila.com

STABILA Messgeräte Gustav Ullrich GmbH · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

STABILA Messgeräte Gustav Ullrich GmbH operates a professional website focused on precision measuring instruments such as spirit levels, lasers, and tape measures. The company targets professional tradespeople and industries requiring high-quality measuring tools, maintaining a consistent and professional brand presence with multilingual support. The website is built on the Contao CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and AOS for enhanced user experience. It features a cookie consent mechanism and uses Matomo for analytics, indicating a commitment to privacy compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.stabila.com raises questions about domain registration transparency, although the website content and structure suggest legitimacy. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and CSRF protection, but lacks some security headers and explicit incident response information. Overall, the site is well-designed and functional, with room for improvement in contact transparency and security header implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stabila.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a medium-sized manufacturer in the precision measuring tools sector, serving a global market with localized language options. Its business model centers on manufacturing and distributing high-quality measuring instruments. The website's structured navigation and product categorization reflect a mature digital presence. The use of Matomo analytics and cookie consent aligns with GDPR compliance, supporting operations in Europe and other regulated markets. The lack of visible contact details and WHOIS transparency may impact trust for some users. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The company appears to maintain a focused product portfolio with a strong emphasis on quality and technology.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS and CSRF protection cookies. The presence of a detailed cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of incident response or security contact information limits the site's readiness to handle security incidents transparently. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear terms of service and incident response policies to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet modern standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit WHOIS registration details to ensure domain registration transparency and consistency with business identity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
STABILA Messgeräte Gustav Ullrich GmbH
Description
For all those who take pride in the quality of their work. True pro’s measure with STABILA.
Key services
Spirit levels, Electronic measuring tools, Lasers, Laser distance measurers, Folding rules, Tape measures
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Contao CMS, Colorbox, jQuery UI, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Contao Open Source CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF protection cookie present
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie descriptions

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Walls.io social wall
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. No WHOIS data available for domain
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie descriptions
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on landing page
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. Website uses Contao CMS and modern JavaScript libraries
  7. Good multilingual support with region/language selection
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  10. No incident response or security contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Contao CMS platform, leveraging jQuery, Colorbox, jQuery UI, and AOS for interactive and responsive design elements. It employs Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious user tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and viewport settings. Performance is moderate with deferred JavaScript loading and image optimization via WebP formats. SEO is basic with meta descriptions but lacks keywords and some Open Graph completeness. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles but could be improved. No hosting provider information was identified. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stabila.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stabila.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.